Most individuals within the U.S. really feel that neither of the presidential selections supplied by the 2 main events is good. This concern is strongly influenced by opinion makers. The argument towards former President Donald Trump is that he’s a hazard to the nation. The argument towards President Joe Biden is that he’s too weak to beat Trump. There’s a big distinction between stating an actual hazard and voicing the concern that that hazard may not be stopped.
The Philadelphia Inquirer means that Trump step down, following the previous standpoint. The New York Instances argues the case for Biden’s withdrawal utilizing the latter.
I consider the position of the press needs to be to teach voters in order that they will make knowledgeable selections. In asking a candidate to step down, that needs to be borne in thoughts.
Two circumstances could be made. If Trump will likely be an actual hazard to the U.S., then that case needs to be made. If a second Biden time period will likely be a larger hazard, then that case needs to be made. The true difficulty is the state of the nation following the election.
William A. Friedman, Mill Creek
