This text initially appeared on rifttv.com and was republished with permission.
In a world the place fact is buried below layers of company and authorities agendas, a chilling revelation emerges: the LED mild mandate is not any harmless push for power effectivity. It’s a calculated transfer to wash People in synthetic blue mild, a silent weapon rewiring our brains, our bodies, and society itself.
From plummeting delivery charges to fractured households, from political extremism to media-fueled chaos, the pervasive glow of blue mild is not only a well being hazard—it’s a software of management.
Neurosurgeon Dr. Jack Kruse, in an explosive interview with Rift TV host Elijah Schaffer, pulls again the curtain on this insidious plot, exposing how the federal government and media are complicit in a scheme to control the general public’s biology and conduct.
In 2007, the U.S. Congress handed the Power Independence and Safety Act, mandating a phase-out of incandescent mild bulbs in favor of energy-efficient options like LEDs.
Championed as a step towards “sustainability,” the transition gained momentum below the Obama administration, with the Division of Power implementing stricter effectivity requirements.
By 2028, below Biden administration guidelines, incandescent bulbs will probably be successfully banned, changed by LEDs that emit excessive ranges of blue mild.
The Division of Power touts this as a triumph for lowering carbon emissions, claiming LEDs use as much as 80% much less power. However what’s left unsaid is the price to human well being and societal stability.
Blue mild, with wavelengths between 400 and 500 nanometers, mimics the spectrum of pure daylight however lacks the steadiness of daylight’s full spectrum. Research from establishments like Harvard Medical College have linked extended publicity to blue mild—particularly at evening—to disrupted circadian rhythms, suppressed melatonin manufacturing, and elevated dangers of weight problems, diabetes, and temper issues.
But, the federal government’s push for LEDs ignores these findings, prioritizing company pursuits and inexperienced optics over public well-being.
Kruse, a board-certified neurosurgeon, warns that is no accident however a deliberate technique to hold People sick, infertile, and divided.
He factors to the rise of the “incel,” involuntary celibate, motion, significantly amongst younger males with far-right political leanings, as a symptom of blue mild toxicity.
“What if I used to be to inform you that sexual identification, gender, and sexual alternative can be on a spectrum?” Kruse stated, explaining that blue mild disrupts non-visual photoreceptors, significantly vitamin A (retinol), which impacts sleep and hormonal pathways. “It strikes your epigenetics forwards and backwards. It’s largely methylation and histone modification on DNA.”
This epigenetic shift, Kruse claims, suppresses testosterone and oxytocin, hormones essential for bonding, copy, and social engagement. The end result? A era of males disinterested in relationships or procreation, proudly embracing asexuality below purple and black flags—colours Kruse notes satirically align with ultraviolet mild and semiconductor properties tied to mild toxicity.
“I don’t assume the folks in that neighborhood are good sufficient to know that purple and black was actually clever to choose,” he remarked, hinting at a deeper, virtually orchestrated affect.
This hormonal disruption, Kruse argues, dampens activism by sapping the drive for collective motion.
“Whenever you’re in a dedicated relationship with a lady, she has an obligation to inform you for those who’re performing or not performing,” he stated, linking sexual dysfunction to broader societal apathy.
By weakening household items and lowering delivery charges, blue mild publicity aligns with what Kruse sees as a technocratic agenda to regulate inhabitants progress and suppress resistance.
“The federal government proper now needs you sick, needs you infertile, as a result of what does that do? It really provides them extra energy over us,” he warned.
Kruse’s most explosive declare is that the media and leisure industries, saturated with blue-light-emitting screens, are complicit on this manipulation.
From smartphones to TVs to LED-lit studios, the fixed publicity retains viewers in a state of heightened stress and diminished cognitive readability.
“What does blue mild do to blood glucose and insulin? Raises each of them. You don’t must eat a cheesecake,” Kruse defined, noting that this metabolic stress mimics a fight-or-flight response, conserving audiences agitated and distracted.
This atmosphere, he argues, fuels divisive political narratives and sensationalized content material, as seen in what Schaffer known as the “telenovelas of politics.”
Kruse agreed: “It’s bullshit. It’s like, fucking these are cleaning soap operas. I do know it will get eyeball clicks, however you already know why? As a result of these are retards which are all…blue lit.”
By conserving audiences hooked on divisive, emotionally charged media, the business ensures they continue to be too fatigued and polarized to query the bigger agenda.
Kruse pointed to the NFL’s adoption of rainbow-colored campaigns as proof of catering to shifting social norms influenced by light-induced hormonal adjustments, noting, “There’s a number of gays that like soccer… that’s the proof that that’s occurring right here.
‘He additionally criticized the media’s function in normalizing distraction over substance, citing figures like Candace Owens who, he claims, deal with drama relatively than addressing root causes like abortion’s affect on black communities.
“The liberals, they’re okay about killing black infants… we’ve killed extra black infants in abortion clinics than we did something in slavery,” Kruse stated, accusing the media of ignoring these truths to keep up management.
Kruse’s resolution is radical but easy: reject the blue mild agenda by embracing pure daylight and minimizing synthetic mild publicity. He advocates for incandescent bulbs, blue-blocking glasses, and red-light remedy, urging Schaffer to analyze the LED mandate’s origins.
“I want you because the journalist to go after that story. We have to reverse that impact so we don’t have these lights that we return to incandescence,” he pleaded, framing it as a battle to revive fertility, household, and freedom.
By seeing the dawn and lowering display time, Kruse believes people can reclaim their well being and resist technocratic management.
Whether or not you purchase into his theories or not, the LED mandate’s implications demand scrutiny. Why did the federal government push for lights that disrupt our hormones and sleep? Who advantages from a inhabitants too drained, too divided, to battle again? As People, we delight ourselves on questioning authority—however are we questioning sufficient?
