To the Editor:
Re “After Arrests at Columbia, College students Face Extra Fallout” (information article, April 21):
As dad and mom of scholars suspended by Columbia College and Barnard School, we write to precise our outrage.
After deploying the New York Police Division on Columbia’s campus to close down what Chief of Patrol John Chell characterised as a “peaceable” protest (as reported in The Columbia Every day Spectator), Columbia and Barnard have suspended over 100 college students, an amazing lots of whom have been summarily evicted from their dorms and barred from eating halls and not using a formal investigation or listening to.
Among the many evicted are lower-income college students, college students of shade, college students with disabilities and first-generation college students. The safety of scholars has been additional compromised by vicious doxxing. We query the legality of a lot of what Columbia and Barnard have finished in the previous few days and worry for our youngsters’s security.
Whereas we dad and mom come from quite a lot of spiritual faiths and social backgrounds, we’re all invested in our youngsters’s well-being and schooling. We due to this fact discover the actions taken by the administration deeply troubling and opposite to the rules of liberty, justice and tutorial freedom which are basic to the mission of upper schooling.
We demand that Columbia and Barnard repeal the suspensions of all suspended college students. If Columbia and Barnard don’t reverse course and restore some steadiness within the therapy of their college students, they threat tarnishing their reputations as instructional establishments that worth free mental change and the pursuit of justice.
D. Borus
J. Cuming
Ms. Cuming is a Barnard graduate. The letter was signed by 56 different dad and mom of suspended college students.
To the Editor:
Re “Columbia College to Maintain Courses Remotely After Weekend Protests” (information article, nytimes.com, April 22):
As a Jewish school scholar, I’ve discovered the ignorance and extremism I’ve seen on campus since Oct. 7 deeply upsetting. Each my very own experiences and people of my friends have proven me that information and a capability to have troublesome, however civil, conversations are the keys to overcoming the extremist forces overtaking so lots of America’s school campuses.
Though I perceive considerations about scholar security, I used to be deeply dissatisfied with Columbia College’s resolution to carry distant courses, thus interfering with the each day operations of the college and the schooling of its college students. In going distant, Columbia capitulated to the forces of disinformation, incivility and antisemitism driving these protests.
Within the coming days, I hope that Columbia and different establishments which are at the moment engulfed in protests work to satisfy their missions of training younger individuals — our future leaders — whereas creating areas for troublesome conversations and taking concrete steps to cease horrific acts of antisemitism. The long run well being of our democracy is determined by it.
Zane Nagel
Washington
The author attends the Georgetown College Faculty of International Service.
To the Editor:
I’m 78 years previous — a product of the ’60s and a graduate of Columbia College. I protested and marched in Washington, D.C., and New York Metropolis and on the campus of Columbia in 1968. We had been offended, however we had hope that we might result in change. And till right now I’ve stored these values.
However I now really feel a kind of despair that’s new to me. I’ve no problem with criticizing Israel, with peaceable protest, however the operative phrase is peaceable. The harassment and hatred being expressed at Columbia in opposition to Jews are really scary. And my deepest query is: The place is the left? The place is its condemnation of the hatred? That silence is deafening.
Doris Dlugacz
Woodmere, N.Y.
To the Editor:
Re “Universities Attempt to Quell Professional-Palestinian Protests” (entrance web page, April 23):
In seeing the unrest at Columbia and different campuses across the nation, it appears apparent that the divisiveness is escalated by the political theater of hauling college leaders in entrance of members of Congress. I’m really curious as to what objective these “hearings” play in furthering our nation past giving politicians with deep agendas the free airtime to play to their bases.
Why will we proceed to permit members of Congress to drive us additional aside for their very own profit?
Matt Glass
South Orange, N.J.
To the Editor:
Among the many points which are on the heart of the acrimony concerning the pro-Palestinian protests on campuses, the calls for of the protesters at Yale that the college divest from arms producers are completely affordable.
A college, Yale or another, discredits itself as an establishment of upper studying through the use of its monetary assets to finance technique of mass destruction.
John A. Viteritti
Laurel, N.Y.
Reward for Liz Cheney’s Plea to the Justices on Trump’s Immunity Declare
To the Editor:
Re “The Justices Ought to Rule Promptly on Trump,” by Liz Cheney (Opinion visitor essay, April 22):
Thanks, Ms. Cheney, for presenting a crystal clear rationale for the Supreme Courtroom to wrap up the difficulty of presidential immunity in a well timed method and let the trial about efforts to overturn the 2020 election proceed and hopefully conclude earlier than the November 2024 election.
Voters actually have the appropriate to listen to what precisely Donald Trump did on Jan. 6. Many people had been dissatisfied that the Supreme Courtroom determined to listen to Mr. Trump’s preposterous arguments that he’s immune from prosecution as a result of he was president, however it was not a shock.
Three of the present justices (Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett) had been nominated by Mr. Trump, whereas Justice Clarence Thomas’s spouse, Ginni, is an energetic Republican operative and an election denier. And everyone knows that Samuel Alito is a right-wing extremist.
I’m extraordinarily involved that these 5 biased jurists will do something of their energy to assist Mr. Trump. I don’t imagine that, within the phrases of Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices merely “name balls and strikes.” Maybe earlier justices did that, however not the present Roberts court docket filled with right-wing partisans, promoted by the Federalist Society, whose principal aim is social re-engineering.
Michael Hadjiargyrou
Centerport, N.Y.
To the Editor:
I might be referred to as a lifelong liberal who principally disagreed with anybody who espoused Republican Occasion views. My softening towards just a few Republicans is a direct results of the mayhem that former President Donald Trump has delivered to our nation.
His over-the-top, harmful behaviors are a supply of disgust and anxiousness as I think about the potential of this man getting re-elected. And his rise has solely pushed me additional away from any sense of religion in our political system.
However there are just a few brave and clever Republicans who’re capable of see by means of this man’s ego and obsessions with himself sufficient to talk out to any American prepared to listen to the reality. These embrace Liz Cheney.
I’ve such admiration for her. She continues to talk with readability, honesty and deep braveness to name out Mr. Trump to members of her celebration.
Thanks, Ms. Cheney, for educating me to look past the celebration labels and to take heed to the phrases.
Maureen Cleary
Whitefish, Mont.
