The Ninth Circuit Courtroom of Appeals on Thursday upheld California’s ban on large-capacity magazines.
The en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit Courtroom (a call from the courtroom’s total slate of judges) sided with California’s radical Marxist Lawyer Common Rob Bonta.
In 2023, a federal choose struck down California’s ban on high-capacity gun magazines.
US District Choose Roger Benitez, a George W. Bush appointee, in his ruling stated, “there isn’t a American custom of limiting ammunition capability.” The choose stated removable magazines “solved an issue with historic firearms: working out of ammunition and having to slowly reload a gun.”
“There have been, and there will probably be, occasions the place many greater than 10 rounds are wanted to cease attackers,” Benitez wrote, in accordance with CBS Information. “But, underneath this statute, the State says ‘too dangerous.’”
The choose is completely appropriate.
Nonetheless, California’s radical Lawyer Common Rob Bonta instantly filed an attraction.
In October 2023, the Ninth Circuit granted California’s request for a keep of the district courtroom choose’s resolution.
Final 12 months the Ninth Circuit took up one other problem to the state’s ban on high-capacity magazines.
On Thursday, in a 7-4 resolution, the courtroom’s total slate of judges upheld the ban on large-capacity magazines.
Choose Lawrence VanDyke, a Trump appointee who grew up in Bozeman, Montana, angered a lefty choose on the courtroom after he launched a extremely uncommon video dissent demonstrating him dealing with a number of completely different firearms.
Choose Marsha Berzon, a Clinton appointee, blasted Choose VanDyke for releasing the video dissent.
“Choose Berzon identified two issues with Choose VanDyke’s reliance on the video: (1) The video is just not a part of his written dissent and it contains information outdoors the document. (2) Choose VanDyke has in essence appointed himself as an knowledgeable witness on this case, offering a factual presentation with the categorical intention of convincing the readers of his view of the information with out complying with any of the procedural safeguards that often apply to consultants and their testimony, whereas concurrently serving on the panel deciding the case,” the judges wrote in a pointy rebuke.
WATCH:
BREAKING: ninth Circuit en banc courtroom upholds California’s ban on giant gun magazines, 7-4. Choose Van Dyke’s extremely uncommon video dissent, exhibiting him dealing with handguns, sparks sharp response from Choose Berzon. Doc: https://t.co/l0ZyLYFgsk Video: https://t.co/ZfLY6tOKZv
— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) March 20, 2025
