Just a few years in the past, filmmakers Emma Schwartz and Mary Robertson keep in mind paying attention to video compilations from previous Dan Schneider collection that confirmed youngsters and younger teenagers “enacting scenes which might be arguably sexual in nature.”
“One instance you see Ariana Grande squeezing a potato, or Ariana Grande — who was then a younger teenager — pouring water on her chest and face,” Robertson recollects throughout a panel at Deadline’s Contenders TV: Documentary + Unscripted occasion. “And also you see Jamie Lynn Spears receiving this squirt of a viscous liquid on her face. And there have been many on social media who had been asking, ‘Did I develop up watching these clips?’ ”
Their shock over what they discovered on social media, along with a narrative about ’90s youngsters TV in Enterprise Insider, is what prompted the creation of Quiet on Set: The Darkish Facet of Youngsters TV. The Investigation Discovery docuseries got down to uncover the poisonous and harmful tradition on the units of Schneider’s Nickelodeon youngsters’s reveals within the late Nineteen Nineties and early 2000s.
RELATED: ‘Quiet On Set’: Dan Schneider, Others React To Investigation Discovery Docuseries
“I used to be a child. And so the humor, if you happen to may name it humor, went over my head,” Robertson stated. “And if these scenes that featured youngsters that had been arguably sexual in nature had been made on units with many adults round, which grownup stated sure and which grownup stated no? What was the ability dynamic at play?”
RELATED: Former Disney Channel Star Christy Carlson Romano Says She Gained’t Watch ‘Quiet On Set’, Calls Docuseries “Extraordinarily Triggering”
Schwartz acknowledges that adults within the ’90s clearly didn’t query such content material in the identical approach that adults can and must be doing at this time. That’s what Quiet on Set tries to perform.
“Perhaps these are conversations we’re having in 2024 as a result of we’re at a spot in our tradition the place we will ask questions that had been more durable to vocalize previously,” Schwartz tells Deadline. “For those who’re a child, perhaps you didn’t perceive what was humorous, but when an grownup in energy is laughing, youngsters will giggle at jokes since you assume it’s speculated to be humorous. So that you giggle. It doesn’t imply you get the joke otherwise you perceive the joke.”
RELATED: Contenders TV Doc + Unscripted – Deadline’s Full Protection
She added: “I believe maybe the instance that’s most putting to me is the instance of simply the character Penelope Taint, which was a personality that was created for The Amanda Present. Dan Schneider created this character, and he wished it to be named with a final title that was a vulgar phrase for a physique half, and particularly instructed the writers, ‘Don’t inform anybody.’ When somebody from requirements got here and [questioned it], he stated no, and simply flat-out denied it. That was an instance of each the ability that was held but additionally the best way by which [standards] felt there was clear intention behind the sexualization of youngsters on the programming on these units.”
Examine again Monday for the panel video.
