On Wednesday, Columbia College President Nemat “Minouche” Shafik will face a congressional committee over allegations that the management of the Ivy League college has failed to guard college students and employees from rising anti-Semitism on its New York Metropolis campus.
The college is one among many elite colleges throughout the US which have emerged as battlegrounds for protests, counterprotests and explosive allegations linked to Israel’s battle on Gaza, through which greater than 34,000 individuals have been killed, most of them girls and kids.
Professional-Palestinian protesters have alleged that they’ve been victimised by college authorities and that they’ve confronted bodily assaults in some situations. Others have accused college authorities of not doing sufficient to counter anti-Semitism on campus.
Amid these heightened tensions, a congressional committee has been investigating allegations that universities have didn’t defend college students from anti-Semitism. The stakes are excessive for Shafik, the primary feminine president of the college, appointed final yr. Virginia Foxx, the Republican chairwoman of the committee, has accused Columbia of “a number of the worst circumstances of anti-Semitic assaults, harassment, and vandalism on campus”.
The Home investigation has already claimed two scalps: College of Pennsylvania (UPenn) President Elizabeth Magill and her Harvard counterpart Claudine Homosexual, amid related allegations in opposition to them, and criticism of their responses to the congressional committee.
As Shafik prepares to face the Home panel, here’s a take a look at what the controversy is all about, how divisions over the battle have performed out at Columbia, and what may occur subsequent.
What’s the backdrop?
Three of the US’s prime universities got here below the unwelcome highlight late final yr when the presidents of UPenn, Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Know-how (MIT) have been summoned for a congressional listening to on anti-Semitism.
The occasion was seen as a triumph for Home Republican Convention Chair Elise Stefanik, a confessed “ultra-MAGA”, who ambushed the trio — UPenn’s Magill, Harvard’s Homosexual and MIT President Sally Kornbluth — on the tail finish of a five-hour grilling, urgent for a “sure” or “no” response on whether or not protesters calling for genocide of Jews have been breaking faculty speech guidelines.
Although there Stefanik and others on the Home committee didn’t current any proof of chants calling for genocide of Jews on these college campuses, the legalistic responses of Magill, Homosexual and Kornbluth within the December listening to drew bipartisan condemnation.
All three equivocated, saying in numerous ways in which it relied on context, Stefanik’s outraged dissection of their fumbling responses going viral. The bipartisan backlash that adopted led Magill to resign, and Homosexual adopted go well with after a subsequent pile-on of plagiarism allegations.
Days after the listening to, the Home handed a bipartisan decision introduced by Stefanik, Home Majority Chief Steve Scalise and Democratic Representatives Jared Moskowitz and Josh Gottheimer, shaming the school elders for “evasive and dismissive” testimony.
No matter whether or not heads roll this time spherical or not, Shafik’s listening to is more likely to be gruelling. “It’s the Wild West,” says Christopher Armstrong, a companion at legislation agency Holland & Knight, who represents purchasers below congressional investigation. “With cameras in Congress and with our politics turning into extra divided and heated, it’s a minefield for witnesses.”
What’s the case in opposition to Columbia?
Shortly after December’s listening to, lawmakers intensified their scrutiny of universities, opening an official investigation on studying environments and disciplinary procedures at UPenn, Harvard and MIT, which was prolonged in February to incorporate Columbia.
Committee Chairwoman Foxx despatched Columbia’s management a letter (PDF), demanding they hand over a trove of paperwork, alleging that “an setting of pervasive antisemitism” had been documented on the college for greater than twenty years earlier than the beginning of the present battle on Gaza following the Hamas assault on Israel on October 7.
“We have now grave issues relating to the inadequacy of Columbia’s response to antisemitism on its campus,” stated Foxx within the letter, which outlined quite a few circumstances of verbal and bodily abuse, intimidation and harassment.
She referenced on-campus distribution of pamphlets carrying the “from the river to the ocean” slogan — a Palestinian name for freedom from the occupation that Israel’s critics say it has tried to falsely painting as an anti-Semitic, and even genocidal, chant. Fox cited the show of posters with photos of a blue and white skunk with a Star of David on its again, and the presence of protesters endorsing the Intifada — which is what Palestinians have referred to as civil uprisings in opposition to Israel’s occupation of territory recognised internationally as belonging to Palestine. Fox additionally talked about assist on campuses for assaults by Yemen’s Houthi fighters on Israel-linked ships within the Crimson Sea.
By attempting to punish chants for reputable Palestinian protest and desires of freedom from occupation, the Home committee, say rights activists, is exhibiting that it’s much less involved about rights and the protection of individuals on campus — and is targeted extra on partisan politics.
Alex Morey, director of campus rights advocacy on the Philadelphia-based Basis for Particular person Rights and Expression, sees parallels with the times of McCarthyism and the Vietnam Conflict.
There’s a danger, she stated, of Congress forgetting concerning the “legislation of the land” and finishing up investigations with out following “the right procedures”. “If we have now Congress using subjective requirements, we run Into First Modification issues.”
“The specter of punishment can chill speech.”
What’s the temper on campus?
Shafik, an Egyptian-born British-American economist, has held prime jobs at establishments just like the Financial institution of England, latterly serving as director of the London Faculty of Economics earlier than touchdown her present place final yr at Columbia.
Whereas Shafik has insisted that the Ivy League college is “not an ivory tower”, it’s exactly the picture of universities as liberal bastions of privilege that’s on the centre of the anti-Semitism allegations it faces.
Stefanik, thought to be a possible operating mate for Donald Trump in November’s presidential election, went on a political fundraising blitz after going viral final December, raking in $7.1m within the first quarter of this yr.
At Columbia, in the meantime, Shafik has confronted criticism from either side. Final November, the college suspended chapters of College students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace, saying the teams had violated college coverage. The New York Civil Liberties Union and a Palestinian rights group have filed a lawsuit on the state Supreme Court docket in Manhattan, naming Shafik as one of many defendants.
Within the run-up to the congressional listening to, the college employed a public investigation agency to nail pro-Palestinian college students, who held a Resistance 101 occasion in March. In an announcement, Shafik stated the occasion featured “audio system who’re recognized to assist terrorism and promote violence”. The college’s College students for Justice in Palestine chapter stated six college students have been suspended and evicted.
PRESS RELEASE: Final evening, Columbia College suspended six college students, together with a Palestinian pupil & two jewish college students with NO due course of as a part of an investigation right into a campus occasion about Palestine. These college students have been evicted & given 24 hours to depart their properties. pic.twitter.com/t4EI247kaa
— Columbia College students for Justice in Palestine (@ColumbiaSJP) April 4, 2024
Professional-Palestinian college students have borne the brunt of disciplinary measures, stated Morey. “[They] are undoubtedly within the sights of many directors. There’s strain from funders and legislators and when there’s that strain, there’s a strain to censor,” she stated.
The scrutiny on US campuses has additionally examined the power of universities to face up for freedom of expression, say critics.
“We see a variety of concentrate on inclusion and variety which is taking priority over core rights together with free speech,” stated Morey. “We’re not saying range just isn’t necessary, however you need to have freedom of expression.”
What subsequent?
The listening to opens at 10:15am Japanese Normal Time (14:15 GMT) on April 17. Whereas there is no such thing as a set roadmap, congressional investigations are usually aimed toward making certain compliance with present legal guidelines or informing the drafting of future laws.
Congressional committees have broad powers of investigation, together with the power to punish events deemed to be obstructing progress, as was the case in February, when Foxx issued subpoenas to Harvard heads for failing to deal with the inquiry into anti-Semitism with “applicable seriousness”.
Morey stated she believes December’s listening to revealed “faculty elders want a way more strong understanding of their position in defending free speech”. To her, Magill, Homosexual and Kornbluth seemed like they’d solely been introduced on top of things on their faculty insurance policies.
The strain shall be on Shafik to keep away from tripping up, stated Armstrong.
“If lawmakers are out to get you, it may be precarious,” he stated. “I typically inform witnesses that you would be able to’t win a listening to, however you may actually lose one.”
