BOEING DOES NOT DESERVE CRIPPLING PUNISHMENT
Boeing might imagine it has a case in opposition to the prices, however that doesn’t matter. The potential harm from a jury conviction could possibly be catastrophic. The arguments could be advanced, and it might be simple for the tragedy of these two crashes to sway the jury to facet with the households of the victims, who understandably are nonetheless seething and really feel Boeing must be punished extra.
The households will “strenuously object” to the deal, Paul Cassell, an lawyer representing crash victims’ households, mentioned in an electronic mail, in response to Bloomberg. “The deal won’t acknowledge, in any means, that Boeing’s crime killed 346 individuals.”
It doesn’t matter that the incident that spurred the federal government to reexamine the deferred prosecution settlement was unrelated to the crashes and in a distinct a part of the corporate. It’s additionally unclear what sort of proof the Justice Division might have in its again pocket.
Boeing ought to take this deal. However the black mark of pleading responsible shouldn’t be a backdoor means of hamstringing the corporate with limits on competing for defence and area contracts. It’s a painful time for the households of the crash victims. It’s a shameful time for Boeing.
This deal will permit Boeing to maneuver ahead on a plan – beneath strict supervision of the FAA and now a company monitor – to overtake its tradition and rededicate itself to security. The corporate must come clean with its errors, but it surely doesn’t deserve crippling punishment, both. This deal strikes that stability.
