Democrat Rep. Jim Clyburn, who represents the sixth Congressional district in South Carolina, appeared on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday morning.
Clyburn instructed CBS’s Robert Costa that his greatest concern that retains him up at evening politically is the free change of concepts on-line.
“What’s your greatest concern? What retains you up at evening politically?” Robert Costa requested Rep. Clyburn.
“Properly, the factor that retains me unsleeping is the misinformation efforts which are underway all through this marketing campaign,” Rep. Clyburn responded.
“Misinformation efforts… I’ve heard a lot from individuals… that appear to really feel that the whole lot they see or hear by way of the web has some substance to it,” he added.
Watch:
When requested what retains him up at evening, Jim Clyburn, Joe Biden’s marketing campaign co-chair has a really fascinating reply:
“Misinformation efforts… I’ve heard a lot from individuals… that appear to really feel that the whole lot they see or hear by way of the web has some substance to it.”
Jim… pic.twitter.com/2BXAXKm4FK
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) February 18, 2024
In fact ‘misinformation’ is simply speech that the Democrats don’t agree with. Democrat insurance policies don’t maintain as much as scrutiny in order that they need to censor their opposition.
Many of the misinformation being unfold on-line is coming from the Democrat-media complicated.
All through the 4 years of Trump’s Presidency, misinformation was the target of the Democrats and the mainstream press. They had been relentless with the Russia Hoax that was confirmed to be a piece of fiction.
Through the 2020 election 51 so-called intelligence officers rushed in to defend Hunter Biden and signed a letter claiming the ‘Laptop computer from Hell’ was ‘Russian disinformation.’
Moreover, the Biden Regime has fiercely labored to silence Americans on-line and The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft is on the entrance traces combating the censorship.
The federal authorities bought caught censoring conservatives on Twitter/X, Meta and different social media platforms.
The Missouri v. Biden case entails the query of whether or not the Biden regime can use federal authorities sources to overtly censor Americans, a apply aggressively begun underneath the COVID lockdowns. The case has revealed a wide selection of presidency companies and officers engaged in telling social media firms precisely what to censor, whom to ban, and what speech is permissible.
Authorized consultants describe Missouri v. Biden as an important case without spending a dime speech in not less than a decade. This case has attracted important consideration after a US District Courtroom labeled the Biden regime’s actions as “essentially the most large assault towards free speech in United States’ historical past.”
