To the editor: As your editorial notes, the dramatic rise in electrical energy demand from California’s rising variety of knowledge facilities can cripple our clear power transition.
Knowledge facilities energy all the things from cloud computing to photographs and textual content created by synthetic intelligence (AI). Placing the controversy apart about how important some AI features are, it’s clear that we must always keep away from backsliding on our transition to scrub power by powering these services with soiled fossil fuels that pollute our air and destabilize our local weather.
State legislators ought to oppose Senate Invoice 1298, which might permit anachronistic fossil gasoline energy crops to function backup mills for knowledge facilities. We now have higher, forward-looking options: improved power effectivity measures, extra rooftop photo voltaic panels and batteries to retailer further power accessible to be used 24/7.
It is senseless to energy the longer term’s AI revolution with outdated soiled power sources.
Steven King, Los Angeles
The author is a clear power advocate for Atmosphere California.
..
To the editor: I used to assume that companies equivalent to Exxon Mobil, Shell and BP simply wanted to be paid off as a way to save the planet, a staggeringly naive sentiment.
Their greed has no bounds. There isn’t sufficient market share to sate the thirst of a monopoly that pays just like the oil business.
AI is simply the latest market innovation to bolster their entrenchment in probably the most worthwhile and highly effective sector on the planet: power. A monopoly on a monopoly.
Have markets already accounted for the inevitable crash, or is it like 2008 another time? Is that why Warren Buffett is so money heavy proper now?
You may ask ChatGPT, nevertheless it looks like consuming your individual tail.
Pam Brennan, Newport Seaside
