The Division of Justice has opened an investigation into the College of Virginia for discriminating towards college students based mostly on the intolerant rules of range, fairness, and inclusion.
The DOJ confirmed to America First Authorized on Thursday that it’s launched an investigation into how UVA “is actively working packages that discriminate based mostly on race, intercourse, ethnicity, nationwide origin, and different impermissible, immutable traits,” in accordance with AFL.
The college has allegedly been discriminating based mostly on DEI regardless of a Supreme Court docket ruling towards affirmative motion and an government order from President Donald Trump banning race-based faculty admissions.
For 3 years, AFL has fought relentlessly to dismantle DEI.
This week, President Trump issued an government order ending unlawful discrimination and restoring merit-based alternative for all People.
This marks the start of the top of DEI. pic.twitter.com/nNZjsBWDIF
— America First Authorized (@America1stLegal) January 22, 2025
However in accordance with AFL counsel Megan Redshaw, it’s not a lot that the college has been blatantly persevering with its DEI practices within the face of those rulings because it that the varsity has covertly rebranded all of its discriminatory packages in an try to look DEI-free.
“UVA has not dismantled its DEI framework — it has merely rebranded it to evade authorized scrutiny,” Redshaw defined in a press release.
“What the legislation prohibits, UVA merely renamed,” she added.
The DOJ’s determination to launch an investigation was reportedly prompted by a letter despatched by AFL to the division earlier within the month, detailing quite a few examples of this rebranding.
The letter famous, for instance, that UVA’s Darden College of Enterprise nonetheless “retains diversity-focused scholarships, programming, and a Chief Variety Officer who oversees strategic implementation.”
“Darden additionally companions with exterior organizations to supply scholarships that favor college students based mostly on impermissible traits,” the letter continued.
In the meantime, the varsity retained many DEI-linked positions however simply renamed them.
Take the “Affiliate Director of International Variety, Fairness and Inclusion,” for instance. The place was merely renamed to “Affiliate Director, International Recruiting.”
/6 Jannatul Pramanik was UVA’s “Affiliate Director of International Variety, Fairness and Inclusion.” After the March 7 vote to dismantle DEI, UVA merely renamed her “Affiliate Director, International Recruiting.”
The job? Nonetheless DEI.
The networks? Nonetheless DEI.
⁰The mission? Nonetheless DEI. pic.twitter.com/3BzFQaEymk— America First Authorized (@America1stLegal) Could 24, 2025
The March 7 vote talked about within the AFL tweet above referenced a choice by UVA’s Board of Guests to dissolve the varsity’s DEI workplace.
“The administration will evaluate the features of the workplace, and all personnel and packages which can be permissible below state and federal legislation shall be transferred throughout the College, inside 30 days,” the varsity mentioned on the time, as reported by UVA Journal.
The letter written by AFL to the DOJ famous that regardless of the vote, “there is no such thing as a public indication UVA responded to the Board of Guests throughout the 30-day window, elevating questions concerning the College’s noncompliance and transparency.”
DEI is an intolerant philosophy that seeks to make up for previous discrimination towards sure races/teams by making use of trendy discrimination towards everyone else.
Probably the most infamous types of DEI is affirmative motion, which requires purposefully discriminating towards Asian and white college students to artificially prop up black and Latino college students.
This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.
