Over the vacation weekend, all however one member of the editorial board of Elsevier’s Journal of Human Evolution (JHE) resigned “with heartfelt unhappiness and nice remorse,” in response to Retraction Watch, which helpfully supplied an on-line PDF of the editors’ full assertion. It’s the twentieth mass resignation from a science journal since 2023 over numerous factors of rivalry, per Retraction Watch, many in response to controversial modifications within the enterprise fashions utilized by the scientific publishing business.
“This has been an exceptionally painful resolution for every of us,” the board members wrote of their assertion. “The editors who’ve stewarded the journal over the previous 38 years have invested immense time and power in making JHE the main journal in paleoanthropological analysis and have remained loyal and dedicated to the journal and our authors lengthy after their phrases ended. The [associate editors] have been equally loyal and dedicated. All of us care deeply in regards to the journal, our self-discipline, and our educational neighborhood; nevertheless, we discover we are able to now not work with Elsevier in good conscience.”
The editorial board cited a number of modifications made during the last ten years that it believes are counter to the journal’s longstanding editorial ideas. These included eliminating help for a replica editor and a particular points editor, leaving it to the editorial board to deal with these duties. When the board expressed the necessity for a replica editor, Elsevier’s response, they mentioned, was “to take care of that the editors shouldn’t be listening to language, grammar, readability, consistency, or accuracy of correct nomenclature or formatting.”
There may be additionally a serious restructuring of the editorial board underway that goals to scale back the variety of affiliate editors by greater than half, which “will end in fewer AEs dealing with much more papers, and on matters effectively exterior their areas of experience.”
Moreover, there are plans to create a third-tier editorial board that capabilities largely in a figurehead capability, after Elsevier “unilaterally took full management” of the board’s construction in 2023 by requiring all affiliate editors to resume their contracts yearly—which the board believes undermines its editorial independence and integrity.
Worst Practices
In-house manufacturing has been lowered or outsourced, and in 2023 Elsevier started utilizing AI throughout manufacturing with out informing the board, leading to many model and formatting errors in addition to reversing variations of papers that had already been accepted and formatted by the editors. “This was extremely embarrassing for the journal and backbone took six months and was achieved solely by means of the persistent efforts of the editors,” the editors wrote. “AI processing continues for use and commonly reformats submitted manuscripts to alter that means and formatting and require in depth creator and editor oversight throughout proof stage.”
As well as, the creator web page expenses for JHE are considerably larger than even Elsevier’s different for-profit journals, in addition to broad-based open entry journals like Scientific Reviews. Not most of the journal’s authors can afford these charges, “which runs counter to the journal’s (and Elsevier’s) pledge of equality and inclusivity,” the editors wrote.
The breaking level appears to have are available November, when Elsevier knowledgeable coeditors Mark Grabowski (Liverpool John Moores College) and Andrea Taylor (Touro College California School of Osteopathic Medication) that it was ending the dual-editor mannequin that has been in place since 1986. When Grabowki and Taylor protested, they had been instructed the mannequin may solely stay in the event that they took a 50 % reduce of their compensation.
