This text initially appeared on WND.com
Visitor by submit by Bob Unruh
Group’s gender ideology ‘is itself quasi-religious, having many points of religions and cults.’
The well-known critics of all issues spiritual, particularly something related to Christianity, on the Freedom from Faith Basis now are being accused of adopting the very ideology the group was created to battle.
It’s as a result of the group censored from its web site an article from Jerry Coyne, professor emeritus of ecology in Chicago, an atheist and a board member.
Coyne wrote “Biology just isn’t bigotry” to critique an early column selling transgenderism.
Coyne’s response was to level out to the FFRF, “The gender ideology which triggered you’re taking down my article is itself quasi-religious, having many points of non secular and cults, together with dogma, blasphemy, perception in what’s palpably unfaithful (‘a girls is whoever she says she is’), apostasy, and a tendence to disregard science when it contradicts a most popular ideology.”
Constitutional professional Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro professor of public curiosity legislation at George Washington College, has written about such contradictions in his guide, “The Indispensable Proper: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
And he stated the censorship agenda on the FFRF got here from “transgender activists” over Coyne’s easy clarification that human intercourse is “binary” and his work to separate the science from the “politics” of the transgender ideology, which has been promoted broadly by Joe Biden.
His criticisms took intention at Kat Grant’s earlier declare that “A girl is whoever she says she is.”
Turley defined, “Coyne provided a view shared by many who ‘[i]n biology … a girl could be merely outlined in 4 phrases: ‘An grownup human feminine.’…As a result of some nonbinary individuals — or males who establish as girls (‘transwomen’) — really feel that their identification just isn’t adequately acknowledged by biology, they select to impose ideology onto biology and concoct a brand new definition of ‘girl.” Whereas Coyne helps equal rights for transgender individuals, he argued that, as a scientist, ‘emotions don’t create actuality.’”
One end result was the resignations of biologist Richard Dawkins and Harvard Professor Steven Pinker in assist of Coyne, Turley famous.
Even so, FFRF “caved into the strain” and eliminated Coyne’s feedback.
The essay now’s showing on “Actuality’s Final Stand.”
In Pinker’s resignation notice, he charged, the muse “is not a defender of freedom from faith however the imposer of a brand new faith, full with dogma, blasphemy, and heretics.”
Turley wrote, “The intolerance for opposing views is so nice that the FFRF is keen to have interaction in atheist orthodoxy, which not way back would have been considered as a contradiction in phrases. It’s a disgraceful place for a bunch that when defended these banned or canceled for his or her views. It’s a second that reminds certainly one of what Robert Oppenheimer stated about physicists, however it’s significantly poignant for these atheists who’ve joined a mob to silence: they ‘have identified sin; and it is a information which they can’t lose.’”
Copyright 2025 WND Information Middle
