Rumors had it that when her parole officer came upon, he didn’t let her attend, leaving Gypsy upset as her idol, Taylor Swift, was scheduled to be on the sport to cheer on her boyfriend, Chiefs tight finish Travis Kelce.
In Lifetime’s “Gypsy Rose: Life After Lock Up,” Gypsy Rose Blanchard confirmed the true purpose she didn’t attend the Kansas Metropolis Chiefs sport.
Article continues under commercial
Gypsy Rose Blanchard Deliberate To Attend The Kansas Metropolis Chiefs Sport
Within the first episode of the docuseries aired on Lifetime on Monday, considered one of Gypsy’s parole officers known as the couple 10 hours after her launch from jail.
Article continues under commercial
Why Did not She Go To The Chiefs Sport?

Through the telephone name between Gypsy Rose Blanchard and the officer, he requested about their plans to journey to the sport. “Gypsy, the place are you going proper now? Are you headed to Louisiana proper now? We obtained a notification that you simply’re going to a Chiefs sport this weekend,” the officer, whose identify was not revealed, requested the ex-convict as she was on her strategy to her household’s home in Missouri.
That’s when the officer advised the 32-year-old that she wanted to depart the state instantly and go to her new dwelling in Louisiana.
Gypsy advised the officer on the telephone that her different parole officer “pre-okayed” the journey to the Chiefs sport. The parole officer then stated he would verify in along with her different parole officer and get again to her.
Article continues under commercial
Gypsy Rose Blanchard Ordered To Go To Louisiana

Within the meantime, Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Ryan Anderson made their strategy to Gypsy’s household dwelling, however as they pulled into the storage, the unidentified parole officer known as once more.
“I simply spoke to the officers there and the establishment, they usually said no, you do not need permission to go to a Kansas Metropolis Chiefs sport this weekend,” he advised Gypsy. “It’s important to go straight from Missouri to Louisiana. I’m providing you with a directive proper now. You can’t make any stops in Kansas Metropolis. Go on to Louisiana.”
After her lawyer contacted somebody on the jail, they knowledgeable her they might not maintain her “in violation for not coming straight” to Louisiana, however she should hold a low profile.
Article continues under commercial
The Risk Of Being Despatched Again To Jail

Moments later, the officer known as to substantiate if Gypsy Rose Blanchard knew her orders, which she stated she did. Nevertheless, it appeared there was confusion once more because the officer advised her she must be on the highway as they spoke, however she was sitting in her dad’s front room.
After a lot backwards and forwards, Gypsy left the room abruptly in tears, declaring she did not need to return to jail.
“What in the event that they’re going to ship me again?” she asks her stepmom, Kristy. The episode ends on a cliffhanger, and viewers should wait till subsequent Monday to see how every little thing performs out.
Article continues under commercial
Gypsy Rose Blanchard Sues A Blogger

Gypsy Rose, her father Rod Blanchard, and stepmother Kristy Blanchard have been allegedly contacted by “Franchesca Macelli,” whose actual identify is April Johns, about hiring her manufacturing firm “Mad Ginger Leisure” inquiring a couple of potential media undertaking on Gypsy’s behalf.
Nevertheless, in 2019, The Blanchard Household was “not in a position to safe any media tasks or produce any marketable content material.” Ms. Johns allegedly turned confrontational over Gypsy’s relationship along with her fiancé Ken Urker, and they also reduce ties.
“Over the subsequent three and half years, Franchesca/April continued to create content material about Gypsy’s case,” the swimsuit said. “These got here within the type of posts, feedback, movies, podcasts, interviews, and so forth. on quite a few social media and streaming platforms.”
In response to the criticism obtained by The Blast, the 32-year-old sued April Johns for fraud, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, false gentle, and defamation.
