To the editor: Why are human beings so anxious to switch human beings? (“OpenAI accuses China of stealing its content material, the identical accusation that authors have made towards OpenAI,” column, Jan. 30)
Now we have already let computer systems run a lot of our lives. What is going to we people do once we are now not wanted, now not have jobs or a objective in life, and now not must exert bodily or psychological effort? Sit at residence watching TV and our smartphones? By no means go to a bodily retailer, which most likely received’t exist anyway?
Sure, I exploit computer systems each day. They’re an enormous assist in offering providers to our large inhabitants.
However I need to speak with an skilled human being, whether or not in particular person or on the telephone, when I’ve an issue. I don’t need to work together with synthetic intelligence. There is no such thing as a strategy to substitute an organization loyal to its staff and staff loyal to their firm. I don’t need AI forcing me to just accept an unsuitable reply.
I need to must battle a bit to write down one thing like this, not have AI do it for me.
So, I assume the individuals writing AI coding have good jobs, and billionaires are pleased to switch these irritating, irrational, pesky people who want greater than a canned interplay from AI. I assume my gardener will all the time have a job, I assume these on the high and their bosses will all the time have a job, however I assume I received’t.
Possibly I’m lacking the purpose of AI or have learn too many science fiction novels.
Deborah Regan, Palos Verdes Peninsula
