The takeaway of any sincere viewer of Kamala Harris’ much-lambasted interview with CNN’s Dana Bash this previous week is that of somebody overwhelmed – burdened, one may say – by the stresses of campaigning, and for that purpose, wholly unsuited to the workplace that she seeks. Though the Left would beg to vary, one can nonetheless degree a criticism in opposition to a so-called “particular person of shade” that isn’t based mostly on race or gender, however fairly, stands alone as an goal evaluation of the candidate’s efficiency.
By way of conviction, Harris lower the other of the picture of a assured chief. The truth that she wanted Tim Walz along with her in tow, who has been needled by the press as “Kamala’s consolation canine” – somebody who is meant to supply assurance for a candidate palpably in over her head, is hardly the look of a powerful, impartial girl. Slightly than be the change candidate, the impression was a candidate ill-equipped in each attainable technique to tackle the solemn and sober duties of the best political workplace within the land. Not a great search for a president.
Kamala’s uncertainty started along with her non-responses, which invariably devolved into “phrase salads” of jumbled and confused ideas, decoupled from specifics on coverage or something resembling a novel or coherent line of reasoning. This was instantly on show when Bash pressed Harris on her pivot on a number of insurance policies, particularly fracking. In 2020, as a Democratic candidate for president, Harris ran on a platform of banning the observe unilaterally. Her change now’s clearly born of political expediency, plain and easy. Everybody is aware of this gambit: she is desperately making an attempt to pander to essential voters in Pennsylvania and different rustbelt states, whose economies so closely rely upon the oil and fuel industries. Solely a idiot would deny that incontestable truth. So too would a idiot consider Kamala at her phrase, and assume she has come to a real change of coronary heart on that problem.
Fortunately, most individuals aren’t fools. This was evident by the downward traits in prediction markets and main pollsters, which had Kamala Harris using the wave of a manufactured “honeymoon interval” narrative within the weeks after Joe Biden was compelled out of the race. The fallout of the CNN debacle was swift and unforgiving: Polymarkets, a betting platform, which had Kamala main Donald Trump earlier than the CNN interview, instantly reverted to having the forty fifth President forward as soon as once more.
After Kamala Harris’ disastrous interview efficiency, Polymarket, a prediction market platform, put Donald Trump within the lead over Kamala Harris.
Nate Silver, a left-leaning pollster who created FiveThirtyEight, additionally yielded a forecast mannequin that gave Donald Trump a 5 level benefit over his opponent in taking the electoral faculty. These polls and prediction markets point out that People can detect a choke and bullshit artist once they see one, and Kamala Harris, whose acted out the Artwork of the Choke in realtime on CNN, got here throughout within the worst attainable approach: an unapologetic liar, keen to say something — together with adopting President Trump’s personal insurance policies, and rhetoric — to get herself elected.
That is very true given her earlier, well-documented devotion to the Cult of Local weather Science, which was zealous and excessive. In 2020, if it had been as much as her, she would have wiped the oil and fuel producers off the face of a planet. Now, in fact, her handlers inform her to talk out of each side of her mouth to pander to what they hope are gullible voters. This explains Kamala’s garbled reply to Bash, professing that her “values haven’t modified,” regardless that she now, apparently, helps fracking – at the least till November 5th.
Will Pennsylvania voters purchase this? They definitely shouldn’t. Her explanations – paired along with her off-putting, holier-than-thou angle – merely don’t make sense to anybody with an IQ above room temperature (and doubtless even to these beneath the mendoza line). That apparently wasn’t sufficient. Incredulously from there, Kamala doubled down. She went on to really describe Joe Biden as an “clever man,” a number of occasions. That is the place, in fact, Kamala’s dishonesty was most illuminating: right here she revealed her playing cards as a traditional case of the woman doth protest an excessive amount of. Kamala’s lies are so brazen as to be unbelievable.
Not like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama earlier than her, and to a lesser extent, Joe Biden (at the least when he was nonetheless semi-sentient), Kamala is a really poor scholar within the artwork of duplicity. She wouldn’t even probably register as an newbie by most counts. For these causes, her falsehoods turned instantly obvious, a lot in order that you could possibly nearly – nearly – forgive the scandalously biased Bash, representing her scandalously biased community, for not interrogating the Democratic candidate additional on the nonsense. Anybody with a pulse may detect it.
And if her lies by some means weren’t already apparent by the shiftiness of her responses, they need to have been discerned by her repeated self-contradictions that riddled nearly each reply she mouthed, eroding the final of her credibility. The clearest case of this being her insistence that Joe Biden was – and stays – an clever(!) man, implying that he’s nonetheless able to remaining in workplace as president whereas she campaigns, regardless that he was ousted in a coup – of which expensive Kamala dutifully performed a big half as co-conspirator – due to his lack of psychological marbles. However heaven forbid Kamala be requested to marketing campaign and govern as president on the similar time. Don’t black (Indian? Who is aware of!) womXn already bear sufficient of the world’s burdens! Heck, in her “warped” worldview, such an ask can be tantamount to a hate crime!
If not that, what different clarification does Kamala Harris have for why she, and never ol’ Joe, was sitting earlier than Dana Bash for an interview about hers – not his —presidential marketing campaign? Alas, Dana Bash conveniently forgot to ask! Possibly Joe’s amnesia is contagious and contaminated each mainstream community!
Democrats naturally love to decorate up the July coup leading to Biden’s ouster in language to the impact of “Joe stepped down for the great of the nation,” characterizing it as a noble act of sacrifice and heroism, which the press, in flip, appears to at all times settle for as an incontrovertible article of religion. They by no means fail to miss probably the most pure follow-up, particularly: what on earth induced Joe to step down, slightly over three and a half months out from probably the most consequential election in fashionable American historical past, after being adamant about not doing so for months on finish, within the first place?
Intelligence and terminal dementia usually don’t go hand-in-hand. However Kamala’s repeated insistence that Joe Biden is “clever,” “so sensible” and “very sturdy” transmits the plain fact that he’s in actual fact not any of these issues. He’s totally incapable of dealing with the duties of his put up as a result of he doesn’t have the psychological capabilities to take action.
It’s a useless giveaway {that a} politician is mendacity once they should repeatedly describe an aged man riven by dementia — now acknowledged universally — as “sensible” and “clever,” each descriptions standing as assaults on purpose and observable actuality itself. The reality is that Kamala aided and abetted the fraud of the century: Joe Biden’s senility. This fraud gravely endangers all the nationwide safety of the nation, all performed to keep away from a connection to that fraud – which, in fact, remains to be ongoing.
That Kamala then had the audacity to say Biden, who unleashed hordes of unlawful aliens into our nation, helped restore our “sovereignty” and “territorial integrity” – and, on prime of that, declare that the variety of immigrants “has really diminished” – takes the artwork of mendacity to an entire new, absurd degree. Including insult to damage, she meshed her lies in an exceedingly dismissive and shamelessly condescending tone all through.
Appearing like CNN was an adversarial outlet – and the mere act of asking inquiries to her, as coddled up as they had been, by some means crossed the road of professionalism, signifies a deeply insecure one that is definitely rattled, even in a discussion board as cloyingly pleasant as CNN’s little doubt is. Prior to now, this could disqualify an individual’s candidacy, no questions requested, as a result of an incapacity to deal with a painstakingly straightforward, softball interview demarcates the naked minimal of what a president is anticipated to do.
Might you think about an individual with Kamala’s exceptionally weak character and disposition coping with Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Bashar al-Assad or Kim Jong-un? In fact not! Her dismissive tone betrays a basic ignorance in regards to the excessive duties of the presidency, or – perhaps even worse – showcases a callous indifference to its significance, an significance which incorporates its venerable historical past and the lofty requirements, imposed by custom, upon every considered one of its officeholders.
Whereas it’s true that it’s been a very long time coming, aside from Donald Trump’s 4 12 months stint, wherein the presidential incumbent actually lived as much as the majesty of the workplace, it’s indeniable that if, God forbid, somebody like Kamala Harris had been to ever occupy that place, for all intents and functions the USA of America can be over. She harbors nothing however scorn, disdain, and resentment for the workplace, and callous disregard — within the type of her odious sense of entitlement — for the establishments enshrined by our Constitutional type of authorities.
It’s one factor to be unaware of historical past, nevertheless it’s one other factor solely to be apathetic of our cultural traditions and customs – not even pretending to care to be taught extra or a lot as attempt to relate to your constituents in a significant, certainly human, approach. Knowledge is present in admitting one’s ignorance; Kamala Harris strikes the portrait of a cutthroat politician, filled with pleasure and hubris and full disregard for the well-being of these over whom she seeks — intends — to rule.
Her election can be a nationwide shame and unmitigated catastrophe on so many fronts. Kamala’s interview with CNN reaffirms this truth – and once more, not that it was wanted, however underscores the extraordinarily excessive stakes of this presidential election, an important in generations. One that may decide whether or not the USA of America will go on, or succumb to pleasure and ignorance, the perennial sins which have introduced mightier civilizations than ours to break. With candidates like Kamala Harris, who’re we to consider we won’t escape an identical destiny?
