Kansas Lawyer Common Kris Kobach introduced Monday he’s suing pharmaceutical large Pfizer for deceptive Kansas residents in regards to the security and efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine.
Throughout a press convention in Topeka, alongside Deputy Lawyer Common Fran Oleen and Assistant Attorneys Common Kaley Schrader and Melanie Jack, Kobach detailed the allegations lodged towards Pfizer.
“Pfizer made a number of deceptive statements to deceive the general public about its vaccine at a time when People wanted the reality,” mentioned Kobach.
The grievance, lodged at this time in Thomas County District Court docket, accuses Pfizer of deceptive Kansans in regards to the vaccines’ dangers, together with potential hurt to pregnant girls and the danger of myocarditis. The go well with additional alleges that Pfizer falsely claimed its vaccine was efficient towards COVID variants, regardless of proof on the contrary.
Pfizer can be accused of suggesting its vaccine prevented COVID-19 transmission regardless of admitting it had not studied whether or not its vaccine halted transmission.
The State of Kansas outlines a number of particular allegations in its lawsuit:
1. Pfizer misled the general public that it had a “secure and efficient” COVID-19 vaccine.
2. Pfizer mentioned its COVID-19 vaccine was secure although it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was linked to severe hostile occasions, together with myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer hid this vital security info from the general public.
3. Pfizer mentioned its COVID-19 vaccine was efficient although it knew its COVID19 vaccine waned over time and didn’t defend towards COVID-19 variants. Pfizer hid this vital effectiveness info from the general public.
4. Pfizer mentioned its COVID-19 vaccine would stop transmission of COVID-19 although it knew it by no means studied the impact of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.
5. To maintain the general public from studying the reality, Pfizer labored to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.
6. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “secure and efficient” vaccine resulted in document firm income of roughly $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine gross sales in simply two years.
7. Pfizer’s actions and statements regarding its COVID-19 vaccine violated earlier consent judgments with the State of Kansas.
8. Pfizer’s actions and statements regarding its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Shopper Safety Act, Ok.S.A. 50-623 et seq., no matter whether or not any particular person shopper in the end obtained Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
9. Pfizer should be held accountable for falsely representing the advantages of its COVID19 vaccine whereas concealing and suppressing the reality about its vaccine’s security dangers, waning effectiveness, and incapacity to forestall transmission.
You may learn the grievance right here.
WATCH:
BREAKING: Kansas Lawyer Common Kris Kobach is suing Pfizer for “deceptive Kansans on COVID vaccine.”
Kobach alleges Pfizer misled Kansans on the vaccine’s unwanted side effects, comparable to miscarriages and myocarditis.
“Pfizer made a number of deceptive statements to deceive the general public… pic.twitter.com/RNB8sA7oER
— Fact In Media (@Truth_InMedia) June 17, 2024
The Gateway Pundit beforehand reported that in a case involving the Well being Freedom Protection Fund and different plaintiffs versus the Los Angeles Unified College District (LAUSD), the courtroom acknowledged the plaintiffs’ declare that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines don’t meet the normal definition of vaccines as a result of they don’t stop the unfold of the virus however solely mitigate signs.
In its choice, the ninth Circuit highlighted that the district courtroom had misapplied the precedent set by Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which upheld necessary smallpox vaccinations attributable to their effectiveness in stopping illness unfold. The courtroom famous that the plaintiffs’ claims, taken as true at this stage, counsel that the COVID-19 vaccines don’t successfully “stop the unfold” of COVID-19, thereby warranting additional consideration of their allegations.
