To the editor: Manuel Pastor and Miguel Santana — authors of the Aug. 11 op-ed article, “What Kamala Harris wants to recollect about California’s anti-immigrant previous” — are little question two very well-meaning people. Nevertheless, their framing of the problem makes a collection of false equivalencies.
Attempting to equate mass deportations of undocumented immigrants already residing within the U.S. to efforts aimed toward curbing the surge in migrants looking for asylum on the U.S. border is a bridge too far.
I marched towards Proposition 187 in 1994, and I’d march towards it tomorrow if it was on the poll once more. Nevertheless, public help for immigration over the long term requires a muscular, truthful and pragmatic method on the border.
Pastor and Santana fret over the MAGA vote however promote quick the true issues of reasonable, typically pro- immigrant voters who desire a rational response on the border. These moderates embody many Democratic voters, together with these from immigrant households.
Michael Baker, Los Angeles
..
To the editor: I just lately spent practically three weeks within the hospital recovering from a coronary heart assault, and plenty of of my nurses and docs had been immigrants or the little children of immigrants.
They had been from nations such because the Philippines, Thailand, Nigeria and Mexico. With out exception they had been expert and caring, and so they helped me get better from being on loss of life’s doorstep. One nurse advised me his father had a garden care service and made him work with him throughout the scorching summers so he could be motivated to go to varsity.
As I regarded up at their faces, I used to be saddened to consider the best way that former President Trump vilifies immigrants and the way this should make my new mates really feel. His remarks present an utter lack of information of what’s occurring on daily basis throughout America.
Philip Reed, Lengthy Seaside
