You’ve obtained at hand it to her; nobody in America has labored tougher than Michigan’s Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to earn the title of the nation’s dirtiest election official.
On September 22, 2024, we warned of a stunning plan by Democrats to steal the upcoming common election.
Within the 2000 presidential election, a mere 629 votes separated the race between George W. Bush and Al Gore in Florida. When the absentee abroad votes lastly arrived, George W. Bush was in a position to take the 537-vote lead from Al Gore and win the presidency.
On August 12, 2024, the DNC launched a memo saying that it could spend six figures to gather as much as 9 million Democratic votes from abroad.
The DNC’s acknowledged purpose of profitable the votes of roughly 9 million Individuals by means of its Democrats Overseas web site appears not possible, on condition that, in response to a current report by the federal authorities, solely 4.4 million US residents reside abroad, and solely 2.8 million of these are of voting age.
Watch this gorgeous montage of Democrats working with their allies within the media to push for hundreds of thousands of NON-EXISTENT abroad “voters” to miraculously forged hundreds of thousands of votes within the 2024 election.
Even if navy members solely make up a small fraction of all UOCAVA voters, Democrats and the media proceed to determine all UOCAVA voters as “navy voters” as a strategy to gaslight most of the people into believing that Republicans who wish to safe the UOCAVA voting system are attempting to disenfranchise navy voters.
THIS is how they CHEAT!!! @HarmeetKDhillon
In response to a report by the fed authorities, solely 4.4 million US residents reside abroad, & solely 2.8 million of these are of voting age.
Why are Democrats LYING about these numbers & why doesn’t the fed gov make (UOCAVA)… pic.twitter.com/vxP0U8PFcq
— PattyMI (@PattyLovesTruth) September 1, 2025
Do you know that the Uniformed and Abroad Residents Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) permits on-line voter registration with out requiring verification of id or citizenship standing?
U.S. residents within the USA who want to register to vote should share the final 4 digits of their Social Safety quantity and/or present a driver’s license or state-issued ID.
UOCAVA voters, nevertheless, can bypass the requirement to share the final 4 digits of their Social Safety quantity and/or present a driver’s license or state-issued ID.
The screenshot under reveals how the Democratic Occasion’s “Vote from Overseas” web site, just like the federal authorities’s web site, registers UOCAVA voters to vote in US elections. If the consumer doesn’t have a social safety quantity, the location permits customers to bypass the ID portion of the net registration course of.
On August 22, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, with none legislative approval (which is required by legislation), introduced a plot to permit navy and NON-military voters to vote ONLINE. If Benson’s unilateral directive have been to be applied, it could eternally destroy the integrity of Michigan’s elections.
In her memo to the general public and to Michigan clerks, SOS Benson does what Democrats have brilliantly carried out for many years: they flip the “voters” they use to perform voter fraud into “victims. On this case, the “victims” are non-military abroad voters who don’t even have to show their id to vote in U.S. elections.
Regardless that common election dates are available for the subsequent 50 years on-line, Jocelyn Benson argues that her determination to permit UOCAVA voters to vote on-line is to assist with “the potential for elevated delays in poll tabulation.”
If Michigan voters don’t obtain their absentee poll within the mail or drop field by the deadline, their vote is not going to rely. Why ought to UOCAVA voters get privileges that everlasting Michigan residents don’t?
Her public memo reads:
The Michigan Division of State is happy to announce the launch of a brand new on-line possibility to raised serve the wants of navy and abroad voters. The brand new system will launch publicly on Monday, Sept. 15, 2025.
Developed in step with the Uniformed and Abroad Residents Absentee Voting Act(UOCAVA), the Digital Supply and Return Portal (EDARP) delivers ballots electronically to eligible voters and permits eligible abroad lively navy members the choice to conveniently mark and return an absentee poll to their clerk’s workplace electronically by means of a safe on-line portal.
Beforehand, Michigan’s navy voters stationed away from residence, together with abroad, obtained their poll electronically however have been solely permitted to return the poll by mail, creating the potential for elevated delays in poll tabulation.
Registered abroad voters who keep a everlasting residence in Michigan can also entry the portal to view and print their ballots to finish and mail to their native clerk. The brand new portal might be accessible by means of Michigan’s MILogin system, a single sign-on platform run by the State of Michigan’s Division of Expertise, Administration, and Finances (DTMB) that gives safe on-line entry to numerous state providers and purposes.
ONLINE VOTING FOR MILITARY MEMBERS WAS ALREADY PROPOSED ONCE IN THE MICHIGAN LEGISLATURE, AND IT FAILED.
In 2019, Michigan lawmakers tried to move SB 117, which might have allowed lively–obligation service members who’re absent from the residence the place they’re registered to vote on Election Day to return an digital poll utilizing a U.S. military-issued digital e-mail handle.
The invoice was by no means handed and signed into legislation, but right here we’re, six years later, with MI SOS and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jocelyn Benson, making up her personal legal guidelines with out the assistance of the Michigan legislature.
The July 2024 official Michigan Elections Guide clearly states that every one UOCAVA ballots MUST be returned by MAIL:
Chapter 7: Navy and Abroad Voters, Federal Voter Registration and Absent Voting Applications
Regardless of how the UOCAVA voter receives their absent voter poll, the voter should return their poll by mail. If a UOCAVA voter was emailed their poll, the voter should print the poll, full the poll, and mail the finished poll again to the clerk.
Benson seems to be following the lead of fellow soiled Democrat Secretary of State Adrian Fontes of Arizona when she issued her memo to announce her unilateral determination to permit on-line voting for UOCAVA voters. I’ve confirmed with the MI Secretary of State’s workplace that her memo does, the truth is, embrace navy and non-military voters.
On August 8, Arizona’s equally deplorable Democrat Secretary of State Adrian Fontes introduced in a press launch that he was unveiling a pilot program that might permit abroad voters to vote on-line from the swing state of Arizona.
Arizona Launches Upgraded UOCAVA Voting System to Guarantee Safe, Nameless Ballots for Navy and Abroad Voters
The Arizona Secretary of State’s Workplace has formally launched a brand new, safe voting system for navy and abroad voters underneath the Uniformed and Abroad Residents Absentee Voting Act.
The state is piloting this system with the counties sending ballots to UOCAVA voters for the Particular Basic Election for Congressional District 7.
This partnership with Enhanced Voting marks a serious milestone within the state’s two-decade effort to modernize and improve poll entry for navy and civilian voters serving or residing overseas.
Whereas Enhanced Voting and AZ SOS Fontes declare on-line voting is a strategy to “modernize” our elections, election integrity consultants would describe it as the simplest strategy to steal elections and not using a hint.
In a 2021 letter to members of Congress, 31 prime election integrity consultants and teams from throughout the nation warned in regards to the hazard of voting on-line, in an effort to cease a Protection Division coverage invoice that would come with funding for on-line voting. Of their letter, the election consultants declare that on-line voting is “not protected or safe, and can undermine confidence and belief in elections.”
A lot of the 31 signers of the letter warning the federal government to not fund on-line voting are left-leaning. “Challenge Democracy,” one of many teams that signed the letter, was fashioned after the 2016 election by a gaggle of Obama administration attorneys. “Frequent Trigger,” one other group that signed the letter, is a Washington D.C.-based progressive group.
Listed here are just some of the warnings:
On-line voting in governmental elections has been “rejected as unacceptably insecure” by the FBI, the Division of Homeland Safety, the Nationwide Institute for Science and Expertise, the Senate Intelligence Committee, and the Nationwide Academies of Science, Engineering and Medication, the letter states.
Even with safety instruments comparable to end-to-end verification, encryption, cloud-based providers, and blockchain, cell voting faces excessive safety dangers, consultants warn.
One of many fundamental issues with cell voting is that it depends on the web, which is basically insecure, mentioned Susan Greenhalgh, senior advisor on election safety at Free Speech for Individuals, one of many teams that signed the letter.
“That’s why even banks which have billions of {dollars} to spend on their safety budgets nonetheless find yourself getting hacked,” she mentioned. “[Banks] have a lot higher assets than our election directors do, so that’s proof and speaks to the truth that when the web was developed, it wasn’t developed for safety, it was developed for accessibility.”
One other main concern with cell voting is privateness violations. Whereas private id is a core part of banking safety, the alternative is true for voting. There is no such thing as a mechanism to report and proper on-line voting errors with out revealing the voter’s id and breaching the key poll.
Authenticating a voter’s id over the web can be troublesome. And since voters would use their very own units to forged a poll on-line, it’s basically not possible to ensure no malware or different vulnerabilities exist, even when election officers have safety measures in-built on their finish.
“It’s not simply that [military service members’] ballots may very well be compromised, it’s that the election might be compromised. The democracy that they’re there to guard may be compromised, and it introduces doubt,” Goodman added.
As a result of the federal government has not but discovered a strategy to develop requirements to make on-line voting safe, there’s no federal certification for on-line voting distributors, leaving these corporations “utterly unregulated,” Greenhalgh mentioned.
This had led to distributors “pitching their techniques to state and native officers with probably false, deceptive and/or misleading advertising and marketing claims,” Greenhalgh wrote in a June report produced by Free Speech for Individuals.
“This can be a drawback in that we’ve this unregulated market and the distributors can say what they wish to say and there’s little or no repercussion,” Greenhalgh mentioned.
So, how do we all know these so-called UOCAVA voters are actual folks?
How do we all know their identities aren’t being made up in some boiler room in Pakistan, and probably tens of hundreds (or extra) voters are being added to Michigan’s voter rolls by utilizing made-up names and addresses of vacant houses or flats in a few of Detroit’s worst neighborhoods?
Would anybody in these neighborhoods even discover that numerous pretend “voters” are registered to vote throughout the road, or that the alleged rapid relations that the handfuls of UOCAVA voters are allegedly tied to ever lived there?
Final week, we revealed a bombshell report primarily based on our investigation right into a espresso home in Detroit, in one of many metropolis’s most harmful neighborhoods.
Our report revealed that 31 registered voters with Hebrew names registered to vote at a espresso store positioned at 12041 Dexter Ave., Detroit, whereas public information point out that the house above the espresso store is listed as “vacant.”
In response to the NCOA, not one of the 31 registered voters on the Dexter handle have obtained any mail; the one mail being delivered to the espresso store is to the proprietor, who refused to return our message once we inquired in regards to the 31 residents residing at her small espresso store in Detroit. 
However right here’s the place it will get much more outrageous—EVERY SINGLE one of many 13 registered voters that used Israeli addresses to register to vote (3 of whom forged votes within the 2024 election), has ALL now flipped to “Everlasting Absentee Voter” “Non-UOCAVA” voter standing within the state of Michigan, but their Israeli addresses stay on the voter rolls.
All however one of many 18 registered voters registered on the Detroit espresso store handle lists their intercourse as “U” or Unidentified.
The ultimate “coincidence” with the “registered voters” on the Detroit espresso store is that every one 3 of the votes forged from this handle are from people who registered to vote on the very same day, Oct. 31, 2024, solely days earlier than the November 2024 election.
We have been curious in regards to the 13 registered voters with Israeli addresses, so we requested a buddy with an intelligence background to knock on the doorways of the so-called “Michigan voters” whereas he was in Israel for an prolonged time frame. We have been surprised to find that after knocking on their doorways, NONE of the people may very well be discovered on the addresses used to register them to vote.
Right here’s the place it will get much more outrageous — EVERY SINGLE one of many 13 registered voters that used Israeli addresses to register to vote (3 of whom forged votes within the 2024 election), have ALL now flipped to “Everlasting Absentee Voter” “Non-UOCAVA” voter standing within the state of Michigan, but their Israeli addresses stay on the voter rolls.
Federal UOCAVA legislation states that non-military abroad voters MUST re-register to vote every election yr.
To ensure that these 13 so-called voters to develop into everlasting absentee voters, they’d have needed to all transfer again to the espresso store and re-register to vote as everlasting absentee voters in Michigan, however since their Israeli addresses seem on the voter rolls and there aren’t any updates to their Israeli mailing addresses, it doesn’t seem they ever re-registered.
So, how did these 13 registered voters immediately go from having mailing addresses in Israel to changing into “everlasting absentee voters” in Michigan?
Do we actually wish to make it even simpler for these alleged non-military UOCAVA voters to vote in our elections?
The previous Southern Poverty Regulation Middle board member and George Soros-funded SOS candidate, Jocelyn Benson, who’s at the moment operating to develop into the Democratic Occasion’s nominee for Michigan governor in 2028, has been sued at the least 69 occasions and has misplaced 5 of the circumstances filed in opposition to her.
The plaintiffs embrace State Consultant Steve Carra, who wrote in regards to the dishonest secretary of state referred to as “True Jocelyn: The Purposeful Fraudster.”
Benson has additionally been sued by a county clerk and two township clerks, the RNC, the Michigan GOP, Michigan Honest Elections, and several other voter integrity organizations.
Because of a number of rulings by judges appointed by Joe Biden or Barack Obama, most of the circumstances have been thrown out of courtroom, both for lack of standing or as a result of the partisan judges dominated in favor of fellow Democrat Jocelyn Benson, regardless of overwhelming proof that might’ve stopped her from corrupting Michigan’s elections.
This wasn’t the primary time Michigan’s lawless Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson defied the principles. Within the warmth of the 2020 election, Benson ordered clerks to disregard signature verification on absentee ballots—gutting probably the most fundamental safeguard in opposition to fraud and opening the floodgates for abuse.
A courtroom case was filed in opposition to Benson, and finally, a Michigan choose dominated in opposition to her illegal “steerage” that instructed clerks to rely ballots with out verifying the voter’s id. This ruling confirmed that Benson’s directive to clerks was neither authorized nor enforceable.
Though Jocelyn Benson has already misplaced 6 lawsuits up to now, she continues to mock those that try to power her to observe the legislation and instantly safe Michigan’s elections.
Shouldn’t a state’s prime election official make it his or her accountability to make sure that each election official implements fundamental necessities like voter identification, verification of US citizenship, and signature and handle verification?
Don’t Michigan voters deserve the best to really feel snug realizing that useless voters are nonetheless listed as lively voters on the voter rolls, exterior, third-party teams will not be making an attempt to register canines, US Postal staff aren’t dropping off stacks of ballots in drop containers in strict violation of the USPS guidelines, there will not be extra registered voters than eligible voters in 53 counties within the state of MI, election officers or staff will not be manipulating voter rolls, and that eligible voters are allowed to vote ONCE in our elections?
Why would any Secretary of State battle to cease these safeguards from being applied?
On October 9, the MIGOP and RNC filed a lawsuit in opposition to Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Jonathan Brater, Director of the MI Bureau of Elections that merely requested for the 2 prime election officers to observe the MI Structure and confirm that ONLY Michigan residents can vote in our elections from abroad:
The Michigan Structure permits Michigan residents—and solely Michigan residents—to vote. See Const. 1963, artwork. 2, § 1 (“Each citizen of the USA who has attained the age of 21 years, who has resided on this state six months, and who meets the necessities of native residence supplied by legislation, shall be an elector and certified to vote in any election besides as in any other case supplied on this structure. The legislature shall outline residence for voting functions.”)
On October 21, Decide Sima Patel, an appointee of Democratic Governor Whitmer, dismissed the lawsuit filed by the MIGOP and RNC.
The Michigan choose mentioned the lawsuit was an try to “disenfranchise” voters.
Curiously, the choose by no means talked about the hundreds of thousands of MI voters, together with these serving in our US navy, whose votes are liable to being canceled out by an unchecked system of voting solely obtainable to abroad, non-military voters, who probably have the flexibility to vary the end result of the elections in Michigan.
MI SOS Jocelyn Benson took to “X” to boast in regards to the choose’s determination whereas, on the similar time, deceptive Michigan voters into believing the lawsuit had something to do with “navy voters” in a put up on “X.”
She wrote: “A win for voters and democracy immediately in Michigan!” including, “A federal courtroom upheld our work to make sure navy service members and their households serving abroad can vote, rejecting the RNC lawsuit as an “eleventh hour try to disenfranchise these electors.”
I responded to her dishonest propaganda tweet with a chart exhibiting the big disparity in numbers between abroad non-military in comparison with navy members and their households.
MOST of the UOCAVA voters will not be US navy or relations.
The lawsuit was not geared toward US navy members, as they DEFINITELY present ID & are official residents of the state the place they vote.
You aren’t telling the reality Jocelyn Michelle Benson. pic.twitter.com/f2RwU6Unjk
— PattyMI (@PattyLovesTruth) October 22, 2024
The RNC and MIGOP case in opposition to SOS Benson and Director of Elections Jonathan Brater was appealed to the Michigan Court docket of Appeals, the place all 3 judges who heard and denied the case have been additionally appointed by Democrat Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
The plaintiffs appealed the dismissal. On August 6, 2025, the Michigan Court docket of Appeals affirmed the decrease courtroom’s dismissal. The appellate courtroom unanimously agreed that:
- The lawsuit was filed too late—absentee ballots have been already forged—and thus judicial intervention at that stage was inappropriate.
- The courtroom didn’t consider the substance of the steerage, as a substitute affirming on procedural grounds: the timeliness of the swimsuit and lack of practicable reduction with the election close to completion
At the very least two lawsuits in opposition to Jocelyn Benson are nonetheless ongoing, the primary of which is a lawsuit by a non-public citizen, Scott Aughney, associated to a FOIA obstruction allegation, and the second is by the MI Home, over a Home subpoena dispute, the place MI SOS Jocelyn Benson is refusing to supply the state lawmakers with election coaching supplies, together with entry to the e-learning portal.
On July 21, 2025, the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ despatched a proper letter to MI SOS Jocelyn Benson demanding that she present them with a statewide voter registration listing, detailed procedures for maintening the voter rolls and federal legislation (NVRA and HAVA) details about how ineligible voters have been recognized and eliminated, the id of the election officers resposible for these processes, Michigan’s responses to the 2024 Election Administration and Voting Survey responses and clarification concerning duplicate voter IDs within the MI QVF or Certified Voter File. Benson refused to conform.
On August 18, 2025, a SECOND request (follow-up) was made by the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ with a deadline of August 18.
The smug and lawless Michigan Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, has refused to abide by each deadlines set by the US Division of Justice and supply the requested info.
It’s unclear what the subsequent steps are for the DOJ to acquire info that many consider is crucial if Benson needs Michigan residents to belief the voter rolls, that are, with out query, corrupted.
Will justice lastly be served for MI SOS Benson, or will she proceed to handle Michigan’s dishonest elections?
