Musi has confronted objections to its enterprise practices earlier than. In October 2019, the corporate filed go well with towards a web based advert community, alleging that it had withheld funds owed for advertisements that ran inside the Musi app. In November that 12 months, the advert community filed a counter-complaint alleging that it stopped funds after discovering Musi’s enterprise was fraudulent. “Musi was knowingly and illegally ripping music off from YouTube,” the counter-complaint stated, alleging that when advertisers came upon, it misplaced over $7 million. A decide granted a request from Musi to dismiss the case with out prejudice in 2020.
Cherie Hu, the founding father of the music-business analysis community Water & Music, described Musi’s interface as utilitarian. It’s a spot to hearken to music and make playlists, and that’s it. Customers don’t see track lyrics, details about upcoming live shows, or any options hinting at collaborations or partnerships with artists. “It’s a really generic manner of curating and presenting music,” she says. Even after greater than a decade in operation, it nonetheless feels extra like a shiny CS pupil’s senior undertaking slightly than knowledgeable product.
Musi claims to not host the music movies its customers stream, as an alternative emphasizing that these movies come from YouTube. These movies seem inside Musi’s personal barebones interface, however some flaunt their origins with watermarks from YouTube or Vevo. Customers have to sit down by video advertisements proper after they open Musi and might then stream uninterrupted audio, however video advertisements play silently each few songs whereas the music continues. The app additionally shows banner advertisements, however customers can take away all advertisements from the app for a one-time payment of $5.99.
Not like its main rivals, Musi doesn’t provide a obtain operate, so the music stops with out entry to the web. “Candidly, this received’t be a characteristic ever, attributable to restrictions set in place by YouTube,” a Musi assist account informed a fan final 12 months who requested on Reddit if an offline mode was coming.
James Grimmelmann, a professor of digital and web legislation at Cornell College, says the way in which Musi operates raises plenty of questions. “Is that this copyright infringement? A license for YouTube may not be a license to Musi,” he says. “Does this violate YouTube’s phrases of service in a manner that YouTube may lower it off?” As of now, the solutions are unclear.
One unknown is whether or not enjoying a track on Musi will end in the identical quantity of revenue for an artist as it might if performed straight on YouTube, particularly as streaming payouts calculations depend on quite a lot of components. The Musi assist account on Reddit has informed listeners that it does, with out offering any additional particulars or proof. Additionally it is unclear whether or not a rights holder who needs to take away their music from Musi would have a transparent mechanism to take action with out additionally pulling it from YouTube.
By tapping into YouTube on this manner, Musi seems to have pulled off one thing outstanding: Constructing a booming enterprise in streaming music with out taking up any of the legwork of placing offers with labels and distributors. That causes David Herlihy, a copyright lawyer and music trade professor at Northeastern College, to explain Musi as a “backside feeder.” He believes the app has skated by so far as a result of it’s not technically breaking any legal guidelines. “It’s authorized,” he says. “They’re linking to YouTube, and YouTube has licenses.”
