Re: “To land a second airport, state’s case should be ironclad” [Nov. 29, Opinion]:
The editorial takes without any consideration that progress in air site visitors is each inevitable and an excellent factor. But completely nobody needs a brand new airport close to them. Maybe all of us stand with the late newspaper columnist Emmett Watson and his “Lesser Seattle.” I definitely do.
Please return to a extra basic query than the best way to finesse or cram a brand new airport down somebody’s throat and make a case for why our already overburdened transportation infrastructure and grossly insufficient housing will profit from much more site visitors and other people.
It’s not in any respect self-evident that the roles and revenue the editorial touts make that case.
Eric Weissman, Bainbridge Island
