To the Editor:
Re “Faculties Warn of Punishment for Disruptions” (entrance web page, April 19):
I might not wish to be a university president nowadays. In previous months, the recent breath of Republican politicians led to resignations at Harvard and Penn. Now, the president of Columbia, Nemat Shafik, has come underneath congressional fireplace for being too lenient in answering campus provocations and responds within the subsequent prompt with a wave of arrests of pupil protesters. Damned for doing too little and certainly cursed for doing an excessive amount of.
School campuses are boiling, roiling, with faint echoes of the Sixties being heard in a number of the similar corridors these many many years later. It’s an uncomfortable, uneasy, messy second as college students and directors grapple with First Modification claims slamming into sounds of anarchy and whole dysfunction.
Democracy at its finest is a troublesome combination of controls and freedoms. For these tasked with the delicate balancing act between these two competing tensions, it will possibly typically really feel like an not possible calculation. Now’s a kind of instances.
Robert S. Nussbaum
Fort Lee, N.J.
To the Editor:
Re “Police Arrest Dozens of Columbia College students at Gaza Protest” (information article, April 19):
It’s about time!
These individuals weren’t arrested for being “pro-Palestinian” and even being pro-terrorist. They had been arrested for violating campus insurance policies after being warned. They had been on non-public property disrupting the campus the place college students pay some huge cash to get an training.
The individuals collaborating on this unlawful encampment goal individuals for harassment primarily based on faith and have a philosophy that celebrates wicked acts of violence. No group ought to be allowed to violate campus insurance policies nor put different members of the neighborhood in danger.
Holly Rothkopf
New York
To the Editor:
As an alumnus of Columbia School and the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences, I’m disgusted by the actions taken Thursday by the president of Columbia College.
I attended Columbia within the speedy aftermath of the Vietnam protests and subsequently participated in actions towards the college that resulted within the belated divestment of investments in South Africa, then an apartheid, racist regime.
Sure, we camped on the campus and disrupted administration actions. And I gave up commencement ceremonies for the blockade. However sturdy drugs was wanted to counter wrongheadedness! And robust drugs did certainly work!
It’s deplorable that the college has chosen a weak, small-minded strategy to dissidence and arrested college students who had been expressing their constitutionally assured proper to free speech and meeting at a college the place they’re legitimately enrolled.
Columbia College has all the time been a beacon of free speech and expression, whether or not creative or political. It wants the vitality and beliefs of younger college students, combined with the tempered expertise and data of college, to stay important and related.
Edward Stated, the Palestinian American who taught literature at Columbia, can be shocked.
Clovis Lark
Salt Lake Metropolis
To the Editor:
Re “Columbia Chief Vows Cures to Antisemitism” (entrance web page, April 18):
It’s a tragic day for tutorial freedom in america. On Wednesday, a significant college president advised a congressional committee that she intends to punish school and college students who have interaction in “antisemitic” speech. However cheap individuals disagree about what that time period means. And if we impose a singular definition of it, we won’t be able to converse throughout our variations.
Antisemitism is actual, and it’s rising. However censorship isn’t the reply to it. Or to something.
Jonathan Zimmerman
Philadelphia
The author teaches historical past and training on the College of Pennsylvania and is the creator of “Free Speech and Why You Ought to Give a Rattling.”
To the Editor:
Members of a congressional committee have been condemning the rising antisemitism on college campuses. These committee members haven’t been condemning the rising antisemitism all through America. I can solely conclude that the objective of these members is to not stop antisemitism however moderately to sentence universities in any method they’ll.
Alice L. Givan
Brooklyn
The author is a former analysis affiliate professor at Dartmouth Medical Faculty.
The Airstrikes Between Israel and Iran
To the Editor:
Re “Israel Strikes Iran, however Scope of Assault Seems Restricted” (stay updates, nytimes.com, April 19):
If Israel has to ship drones into Iran once more, it ought to drop leaflets saying, in Persian, English and Hebrew:
“Israel stands with the individuals of Iran! Overthrow your authoritarian authorities, cease funding Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and Houthi terrorism, and rejoin the neighborhood of countries as our companions in peace.”
Stephen A. Silver
San Francisco
To the Editor:
Israel bombs the Iranian Embassy advanced in Syria, killing a number of senior Iranian commanders. Iran fires tons of of missiles towards Israel however warns Israel and the West forward of time. There’s minor injury, and a younger Bedouin lady is wounded.
Iran says it considers the matter closed, and Western nations plead with Israel to not reply. Israel shrugs off the recommendation and assaults an Iranian army base.
Israel suffers no penalties, because the U.S. will proceed the circulation of arms to Israel — except Congress exhibits some ethical braveness and stops feeding Israel’s struggle machine.
Tom Miller
Oakland, Calif.
To the Editor:
“How Israel Miscalculation Poked at a Hornet’s Nest” (entrance web page, April 18) describes the varied miscalculations by Israel in its airstrike that killed a number of senior Iranian commanders in Syria. That could be.
Alternatively, there may hardly have been a greater calculation for distracting consideration away from the struggle in Gaza, and for making certain higher U.S. assist for Israel on condition that Iran was positive to retaliate, and did simply that.
Peter Schmidt
Newton, Mass.
The ‘Ludicrous’ Impeachment of Mayorkas
To the Editor:
Re “Senate Rejects Push for Trial of Mayorkas” (entrance web page, April 18):
It’s gratifying to notice that the ludicrous effort to question and convict the homeland safety secretary, Alejandro Mayorkas, has shortly fallen flat on its face upon presentation to the Democratic-controlled Senate, which appropriately dismissed it as unconstitutional.
The vote by the Republican-controlled Home to ship this matter to the Senate for a trial was a harmful misuse of the impeachment course of. It conflates coverage variations with crimes, and no proof in any way has been introduced that the secretary dedicated a criminal offense.
If Congress doesn’t like the way in which that Mr. Mayorkas is performing his job, by all means carry him earlier than the physique to testify, excoriate him if you want, and/or legislate adjustments to regulation and coverage in his division.
It turns into more and more clear that right this moment’s Republican Celebration is one whose precedence is to sow chaos and to blow issues up. The farthest factor from the G.O.P.’s thoughts is to manipulate with the pursuits of the American individuals at coronary heart.
Oren Spiegler
Peters Township, Pa.
