On the day of Donald Trump’s second inauguration, an air raid was in impact in Odesa for a lot of the afternoon. Folks went about their enterprise. Avenue distributors continued promoting espresso. Trams saved operating. At Pryvoz, the mammoth farmers’ (and all the things else) market, electrical energy went out for some time, however that appeared to haven’t any impact on the tempo of commerce; if it was gradual, that was as a result of it was a Monday. Within the two years and 11 months since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Odesa has gone by phases: months of shock and worry, adopted by one thing akin to denial and, lastly, adaptation.
Odesa is a type of cities — like, say, New Orleans — possessed of a definite character, a mythology of itself that fuels a fierce and joyful type of patriotism. Odesa is rightfully pleased with its sea views, its structure, its meals, its multiculturalism, its entrepreneurship and its libertine spirit, however its singular distinction is the well-turned phrase, the unsparingly hilarious joke.
Hanna Shelest, a army analyst, made a type of remarks early on within the warfare. As she recalled, not lengthy after Russia invaded, an Italian journalist requested her — in that method that male journalists “ask” feminine specialists they’re interviewing whereas truly telling them what to suppose — “You do notice that you will have to present Putin one thing?” Shelest paused and mentioned, “You might be proper. We’ll give him Lake Como.” It was an ideal method of stating the absurdity of the premise, that Ukraine owed Putin one thing simply because he wished it.
I requested Shelest to observe Trump’s inauguration with me. We used the TV in my lodge room. Shelest, who’s 43, and her dad and mom, who’re each 65, have been dwelling in a borrowed condo since a Russian drone hit their constructing on Nov. 14 of final yr. She had simply completed an on-air interview with a French tv channel when she heard a gentle increase, after which the chandelier in her research fell to the ground, simply lacking her mom. It took all of them a couple of minutes to understand that a number of the rooms of their condo had been in ruins, and the condo subsequent door was in flames. Nonetheless, they had been fortunate: The drone didn’t explode. Within the days that adopted, after the fireplace had been put out, Shelest and her mom used a hearth truck’s elevate to get into their condo by a window to salvage some garments.
“That was type of odd,” Shelest mentioned when Trump completed his speech. “I’m confused by the emphasis on sovereignty. Is anybody threatening the sovereignty of america? It’s significantly odd watching this from Ukraine, the place we are literally combating for our sovereignty. It has a method of diminishing our wrestle.” She was a bit shocked that Trump didn’t point out Ukraine, although he beforehand promised to finish the Russo-Ukrainian warfare inside 24 hours. One would possibly assume that Trump was referring to Ukraine when he complained that the Biden administration had “given limitless funding to the protection of overseas borders.” She mentioned a most likely unintended impact of not mentioning Ukraine by identify was that Japan and Taiwan, for instance, in addition to army contractors, had been placed on discover. “And Panama!” she added. “What did calm, peaceable Panama do?”
To me, all of this sounded acquainted. Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, spent a few years trafficking in imagined grievances and illusory threats to Russian sovereignty. Because it usually has been in historical past, this language was a prelude to launching his ruthless wars. Even Trump’s language in regards to the Panama Canal, which he referred to as a “silly reward that ought to have by no means been made,” was a direct reprise of Putin’s statements on Crimea, which he repeatedly described as having been a present to Ukraine from Nikita Khrushchev within the Fifties. As is his method, Trump is transferring quicker than his function mannequin. No sooner had he launched the concept of wounded sovereignty than he promised that “america will as soon as once more think about itself a rising nation — one which will increase our wealth, expands our territory.” Totalitarian leaders, leaders who wish to keep in energy ceaselessly, undertake expansionist wars.
This axiom of totalitarianism makes it unlikely that Trump will be capable of ship on his promise to finish the warfare in Ukraine. Putin wants this warfare.
Putin additionally desires a summit with Trump, which seems to be on monitor to occur this yr. A gathering with the U.S. president would sign an finish to the interval of worldwide isolation Russia entered after it invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
A gathering with Trump wouldn’t solely present Russians — and the remainder of the world — that Putin is as soon as once more a legit voice on the planet; it could additionally give him what he has lengthy demanded: a dialog in regards to the destiny of Ukraine that doesn’t embody Ukraine. Within the week earlier than Trump’s inauguration, some high-level Russian officers made aggressive statements indicating that Ukraine shouldn’t exist in any respect.
For a lot of the previous three years, the Kremlin has both flat-out refused to enter talks on an finish to the warfare or made calls for for territory that far exceeded what Russia had been capable of occupy. If any talks occur, Shelest mentioned, Russia will likely be not find a sustainable resolution however simply in maximizing its personal place.
However Shelest hopes that Putin will overplay his hand. He’s nicely on his method. Final month a Russian oligarch and Putin booster advised The Monetary Occasions that Russia would merely make a present of reviewing Trump’s peace plan for Ukraine, then reject it. (In response, the Trump adviser Keith Kellogg, showing on Fox Information, mysteriously directed the oligarch to “get again in your field.”) Prior to now, Putin has typically indicated that he has a low opinion of Trump’s intelligence. “He could also be tempted to humiliate Trump, to place him in his place,” Shelest mentioned.
May that get Trump’s ire up? “Perhaps he’ll determine that he desires to be a victor,” Shelest mentioned. Perhaps he’ll give Ukraine what the Biden administration has held again: sufficient army assets and the liberty to make use of them to essentially damage Russia. It’s a hell of a factor to see Trump’s propensity to behave out of spite as your nation’s finest hope.
An hour after Shelest left my lodge room, the air raid siren went off once more.
M. Gessen is an Opinion columnist for The Occasions. They received a George Polk Award for opinion writing in 2024. They’re the writer of “The Future Is Historical past: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia,” which received the Nationwide Guide Award in 2017, and different books.
The Occasions is dedicated to publishing a variety of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you consider this or any of our articles. Listed below are some ideas. And right here’s our electronic mail: letters@nytimes.com.
Observe the New York Occasions Opinion part on Fb, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, X and Threads.
