In an interview earlier this 12 months with Joe Rogan, Elon Musk quipped that “the basic weak point of Western civilization is empathy.” He appeared in charge it, partially, for the decline of America’s cultural vitality. He mentioned he believed in empathy however forged it as being “weaponized” by the woke.
For all his derision of empathy, Mr. Musk is kind of good at using it for his personal wants. In actual fact, I’d argue he’s probably the most efficient empathic operators in fashionable enterprise and public life.
Although we frequently consider empathy as synonymous with kindness, that isn’t totally correct. Empathy shouldn’t be the identical as compassion. At its core, empathy is the flexibility to know others’ views — what they really feel, what they suppose, what they concern, what they need. That understanding could be wielded in service of a higher good. Or it may be exploited, as Mr. Musk himself was arguing.
In psychological phrases, empathy shouldn’t be a singular talent — it is available in completely different kinds. As researchers have proven, affective empathy (the flexibility to really feel what others really feel) is distinct from cognitive empathy (the flexibility to know what others really feel). Many individuals have each. Others, like narcissists and sociopaths, typically possess solely the latter, if they’ve empathy in any respect. And that is the place issues can get harmful.
Once I wrote my e book, “Utilized Empathy,” a number of years in the past, I included Mr. Musk on a listing of entrepreneurs who had leveraged their cultural understanding to create compelling companies. He empathized with society’s collective longing for a future-forward imaginative and prescient and provided rockets (SpaceX) and self-driving automobiles (Tesla) as solutions. As a result of these companies responded to our wants, we needed to return alongside for the trip. That’s empathy in motion.
What I didn’t account for again then — and what we’re reckoning with now — is what occurs when an understanding of human habits shouldn’t be used to uplift or assist however to impress or destabilize.
Throughout tech, media and politics, we’re witnessing an increase in leaders who reject empathy rhetorically whereas utilizing it tactically. They discredit this very important talent as weak point, but fine-tune their messaging to set off exactly the reactions they want from buyers, voters and followers. We’ve heard the ideological canine whistles. We’ve witnessed the fear-mongering and overreach shrouded within the guise of defending democracy.
President Trump has lengthy derided empathy as naïve, casting energy as synonymous with domination, suggesting that to care is to lose — and to regulate is to win.
However this angle shouldn’t be solely ethically bankrupt, it’s additionally deeply impractical for management, significantly in enterprise. A 2021 research discovered that staff who report having managers with empathic management expertise usually tend to be modern, engaged and resilient. Based on one latest survey, poisonous office tradition, not compensation, is the main motive for worker turnover. Empathy, utilized with moral integrity, is a driver of efficiency, not a drag on it.
Empathy that connects, that builds, that heals requires a code of ethics. It requires restraint. It requires belief. It asks the empathizer not simply to know others but additionally to honor what that understanding unlocks. When empathy turns into unmoored from ethics, it turns into coercion with a smile.
We see this now with synthetic intelligence, the place methods are more and more skilled to simulate empathic responses. Your chatbot apologizes in your frustration, your digital assistant presents saccharine encouragement, your psychological well being app listens with out judgment. However none of those methods really feel something. They only know what to say. We’re coming into a world the place “empathetic” algorithms outperform our managers at recognizing misery however lack an ethical compass to resolve what to do with it. And if we aren’t cautious, we’ll quickly mistake efficiency for presence. In doing so, we outsource not simply emotional labor however our emotional duty to 1 one other.
Empathy with out accountability isn’t just hole, it’s misleading. It lulls folks into false safety. And it fractures the very belief it pretends to construct.
And but, we are able to’t write off empathy. That’s exactly what the provocateurs need. They wish to reframe care as weak point, dignity as naïveté and belief as a legal responsibility. Let’s not take the bait.
If we wish higher management in enterprise, politics and know-how, we have to reclaim empathy as a duty. We have to train it not simply as a smooth talent however as a disciplined follow, certain by ethics and rooted in our shared humanity. We should maintain leaders accountable not just for what they are saying but additionally for a way — and why — they search to know us.
So, sure, Mr. Musk is an empath. Simply not the type we’d like.
Michael Ventura is an creator, speaker and adviser on empathic management to companies, universities and institutional shoppers all over the world. He’s the creator of “Utilized Empathy: The New Language of Management.”
The Instances is dedicated to publishing a variety of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you concentrate on this or any of our articles. Listed below are some ideas. And right here’s our e-mail: letters@nytimes.com.
Observe The New York Instances Opinion part on Fb, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
