When Republicans took management of Congress in 1947, they had been nonetheless offended that President Franklin D. Roosevelt had received a fourth time period in 1944, and so they got down to go a constitutional modification to restrict future presidents to 2 phrases. John Jennings, Republican of Tennessee, stood on the Home ground and mentioned a twenty second Modification was mandatory to forestall a dictator from taking on the nation.
“With out such a restrict on the variety of phrases a person might serve within the presidency, the time might come when a person of vaulting ambition turns into president,” Mr. Jennings mentioned on Feb. 6, 1947. Such a person, backed by a “subservient Congress” and a compliant Supreme Court docket, might “sweep apart and overthrow the safeguards of the Structure,” he mentioned. With out such a regulation, a president might use the workplace’s nice powers to tilt the political system in his favor and win repeated re-election. Finally, that president might come to resemble a king, successfully unbound by the Structure’s checks and balances.
Within the a long time after the nation ratified the twenty second Modification in 1951, members of each events sometimes chafed in opposition to its restrictions, however no sitting president brazenly talked about evading it — till lately. Mr. Jennings’s warning on the Home ground now appears to be like prophetic: President Trump is a person of vaulting ambition. Congress is basically subservient to his agenda. And he retains mentioning the thought of a 3rd time period.
“I believe I received’t be working once more until you say, ‘He’s so good, we’ve acquired to determine one thing else out,’” he mentioned shortly after being re-elected final November. Although Republicans within the room chuckled on the time, he mentioned in March that he was “not joking” and that “there are strategies which you can do it.”
This previous weekend, he appeared to each step again from the thought and reiterate it. “It’s one thing that, to the perfect of my data, you’re not allowed to do,” Mr. Trump instructed NBC Information. However then he as soon as once more claimed that the choice was his to make. “Nicely, there are methods of doing it,” he mentioned. All of the whereas, his web site continues to promote “Trump 2028” merchandise, together with baseball caps for $50 apiece and $36 T-shirts that proclaim, “Rewrite the principles.”
It might be that this speak is usually a tactical try to push back the stigma of being a lame duck. Congressional Republicans have responded partly by gently disagreeing and partly by downplaying the thought as a joke. “Not and not using a change within the Structure,” Senator John Thune, the bulk chief, instructed reporters in March. He added, “I believe that you just guys preserve asking the query, and I believe he’s most likely having some enjoyable with it, most likely messing with you.”
However Mr. Trump’s third-term fantasizing is extra harmful than this response suggests, and it deserves extra forceful pushback. He has a historical past, in any case, of utilizing seemingly outlandish hypothesis to push concepts he genuinely favors — similar to overturning an election consequence — into mainstream discourse. He assessments boundaries to see which limits are literally enforced. Even when he backs away from a provocation, he typically succeeds in elevating doubts about these limits. His conduct is in keeping with a president who certainly desires to serve a 3rd time period, if no more, and who retains elevating the thought within the hope of getting Individuals snug with it.
Extra broadly, Mr. Trump has repeatedly demonstrated his disdain for constitutional checks on a president’s energy. He has ignored elements of judges’ rulings, deported immigrants with out due course of and tried to eradicate the 14th Modification’s grant of birthright citizenship by means of an government order. All of this conduct means that he would favor to wield energy with out limits.
The suitable response from the remainder of the political system — particularly from Republican members of Congress, governors and others — is to not snort off his musings. It’s to claim the readability of the regulation: Mr. Trump is barred from serving a 3rd time period, interval.
The twenty second Modification, to be particular, says no individual shall be “elected” to the workplace of president greater than twice, nevertheless it doesn’t say that no president shall serve greater than twice. This has lengthy led to an instructional parlor recreation: May a term-limited president run as a vice chairman after which be handed the Oval Workplace when his working mate resigns? Mr. Trump has mentioned that’s one methodology by which he may return as president.
However one other modification — the twelfth — seems to rule out that chance. Its last sentence declares that “no individual constitutionally ineligible to the workplace of president shall be eligible to that of vice chairman of america.” Collectively, the 2 amendments clarify that Mr. Trump’s time in workplace can’t prolong past his present time period.
Republican politicians and conservative authorized students typically speak in regards to the authentic intent of the Structure’s authors, and that intent is crystal clear on this case. The objective of the twenty second Modification was to limit presidents to 2 phrases. As Consultant Edward McCowen, Republican of Ohio, mentioned through the Home debate in 1947, “Eight years is lengthy sufficient for an excellent president, and 4 years is simply too lengthy for a nasty one.”
Within the a long time since 1951, politicians from each events sometimes known as for the repeal of the twenty second Modification, together with Harry Truman and Mitch McConnell. However they didn’t argue that the modification was unclear or might merely be evaded. They acknowledged that any individual who disagrees with a regulation ought to observe a authorized course of to alter it. If Mr. Trump and his acolytes consider they’ve Congress and the states on their aspect, they’re free to start out a repeal marketing campaign. What they need to not do is faux that any a part of the Structure is merely a suggestion. It’s the regulation.
The Occasions is dedicated to publishing a range of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you concentrate on this or any of our articles. Listed here are some suggestions. And right here’s our electronic mail: letters@nytimes.com.
Observe the New York Occasions Opinion part on Fb, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
