This transcript was created utilizing speech recognition software program. Whereas it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it could include errors. Please evaluate the episode audio earlier than quoting from this transcript and e-mail transcripts@nytimes.com with any questions.
My identify is Lydia Polgreen, and I’m an opinion columnist for “The New York Occasions.” I used to be a correspondent for “The New York Occasions” based mostly in India. And I’ve continued to journey to India, sustain with mates there, and comply with the information over the previous decade.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
Final week, India introduced the outcomes of its parliamentary elections. And going into the election, as somebody who’s been following India for fairly a while, I had been anticipating, and plenty of different individuals who comply with India had been anticipating, that Narendra Modi, who’s been the prime minister of India for the previous 10 years, and his polling has all the time been very sturdy as a person, we had all been anticipating that he was simply going to sort of cakewalk into a 3rd time period as prime minister. And he was feeling so assured that he and his social gathering had really requested the voters to not simply re-elect him, however to re-elect him with an enormous supermajority.
None of that occurred. And I believe this simply got here as an amazing shock to lots of people. In actual fact, the social gathering misplaced assist, and so they misplaced assist to such an extent that Narendra Modi will be unable to type a authorities and be prime minister, simply on his personal, together with his social gathering. They’re going to have to search out coalition companions. There’s little or no doubt that he’s going to have the ability to do this. However he has actually, actually skilled a pointy rebuke. And I believe it’s actually a chastening signal for his model of politics in India.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
This can be a massive yr for democracy. There are dozens and dozens of elections taking place all all over the world. These elections are coming at a time when there’s a powerful feeling that authoritarianism has actually been on the march. Organizations like Freedom Home, which sort of monitor the energy of democracy globally, that is the 18th yr that they’ve measured freedom as being in decline in international locations throughout the globe.
And India has really been a extremely massive a part of that. India is a rustic the place Narendra Modi and his social gathering have enacted a bunch of insurance policies which have restricted freedom of the press, which have elevated spiritual tensions, and jailing political opponents and different kinds of actions which have actually sort of constrained the house of democracy in India.
So I believe lots of people have been seeking to this election in India to see which manner is the wind blowing. Are voters going to ask for extra of the identical, or are they going to need change? And there was clearly a decisive vote for change. They despatched a message that they needed a really clear examine on his energy in authorities right now.
It’s actually essential to recollect Modi has actually constructed his attraction on this concept of a sort of sturdy, muscular, Hindu-centric India. And India is a really numerous nation. There are many totally different spiritual teams. There are many totally different linguistic teams. However Hindus are positively the bulk. And lots of his attraction has been constructed on prime of this concept that Hindus ought to rule India and needs to be in cost, and that restoring a sort of muscular, highly effective, forward-leaning, virtually ethnic nationalist posture for India was going to be a method for achievement within the nation.
And I believe that what occurred on this election is that voters, after 10 years, mentioned, OK, what else? What else are you going to offer us? We perceive that you simply’ve delivered financial development, however that financial development is unfold extremely unequally. That development is de facto strongly skewed to the very, very richest of Indians. You’ve got large lots of individuals in rural India, which is the place nearly all of Indians nonetheless dwell, the place they’re simply not feeling the results of that financial development.
And on the identical time, they’re experiencing rising costs, and particularly rising costs for basic items like meals. And so, on some very fundamental phrases. I believe it’s somewhat little bit of, sort of, “present me the cash.” The place are the outcomes? We’ve seen all of the rhetoric, however in the end, are our day-to-day lives getting higher? Do we have now jobs? Can we afford meals? Are costs going up. These are the essential sort of nuts and bolts kitchen desk points that I believe lots of Indian voters have been targeted on.
So I needed to only point out one place that I believe illustrates what has occurred to Modi and his assist, and that’s town of Ayodhya. Modi selected to have a sort of unofficial kickoff of his marketing campaign in Ayodhya. And Ayodhya is a vital place for quite a few causes, however it’s believed by many Hindus to be the birthplace of Lord Ram, who’s a vital deity within the Hindu constellation of gods.
However on the very spot the place some Hindus consider that Ram was born, there was additionally a mosque for a few years. And this had been an actual sort of spiritual flashpoint for a very long time in India. And one of many core platforms of Modi and his social gathering has been that they have been going to construct a temple to Lord Ram on this spot.
I had been to Ayodhya earlier than. I really went there in 2009 after the federal government had issued this massive report about communal tensions there. And this had been a spot the place there had been a contestation between Hindus and Muslims for a lot of, a few years, and within the aftermath of the destruction of the mosque there.
And I had observed that there actually wasn’t lots of hoopla on the spot. Individuals simply weren’t that targeted on these inter-communal spiritual tensions. So that you quick ahead to Narendra Modi in 2024, mainly kicking off his marketing campaign with the opening of this new temple complicated. And I believed, oh, that’s a extremely, actually dramatic transformation.
However it was actually fascinating to me that when the election outcomes have been introduced, within the metropolis of Ayodhya itself, his social gathering really misplaced that seat. So not solely did they lose an enormous variety of seats throughout that complete state, however within the very place the place Modi had gone to have this sort of triumphant second of proving that he might ship on his guarantees, that he’s a person of his phrase, that he’s a grasp builder, that he’s going to vault the nation ahead. That in that very place, they misplaced the election, felt to me prefer it actually underscored the pattern within the dynamic that was taking place on this vote.
I believe the factor that I take away from this election is that it’s best to by no means assume that the pattern strains are going to remain the identical. And also you must also by no means assume that every one is misplaced.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
One of many issues that basically impressed me, simply following the protection and actually wanting intently after we discovered the consequence, was how assiduously the opposition, A, managed to return collectively and keep united. However in addition they, I believe, stayed actually targeted on kitchen desk points.
And whereas lots of people, I believe, actually do care about Indian democracy and care concerning the preservation of freedom of speech and secularism and all of those sorts of issues which might be enshrined within the Structure, the fact is that Indian voters, like voters in every single place, they’re voting based mostly on their pursuits. They’re voting based mostly on the issues which might be most proximate to them and the considerations which might be most animating for them.
And I believe you actually noticed the opposition in India specializing in these sorts of points and simply relentlessly speaking about unemployment, relentlessly speaking about inflation, speaking concerning the failure to ship for the poor. And that message clearly received out on the finish of the day. And I believe the large takeaway for me is that — and I believe that is one thing that political events right here in the USA ought to actually be occupied with — is that generally you simply have to fulfill voters the place they’re, and it’s important to give attention to the problems that they care about most.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
