Secretary of Protection Pete Hegseth delivered a diatribe in regards to the media and its protection of the U.S. bombings on Iran, and at one level he chided a former Fox Information colleague, Jennifer Griffin.
The aim of the press convention, during which Hegseth was joined by Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Employees, gave the impression to be to push again on a report earlier this week. CNN reported on a Protection Intelligence Company preliminary evaluation that Iran’s nuclear program was not totally destroyed by the U.S. strikes and sure set it again solely months. Different information shops adopted with related tales.
Griffin, the chief nationwide safety correspondent on the Pentagon, requested Hegseth whether or not he had “certainty that every one the extremely enriched uranium was within the Fordow mountain, or a few of it, as a result of satellite tv for pc images confirmed there was greater than a dozen vans there two days upfront. Are you sure none of that extremely enriched uranium was moved?”
Hegseth responded, “After all, we’re watching each single side, however Jennifer, you’ve been in regards to the worst, the one who misrepresents essentially the most deliberately what the president says.”
Griffin then famous that she “was the primary to explain the B2 bombers, the refueling, the complete mission, with nice accuracy. So I take nice challenge with that.”
Earlier this week, Griffin additionally reported on the early intelligence evaluation from the DIA, however she additionally famous that the report was given a “low confidence” degree.
Earlier than he turned Protection Secretary, Hegseth was co-host on Fox & Associates Weekend.
Trump and others within the administration have attacked CNN and different shops over their reporting on the DIA report, going thus far to say that it demeans the members of the army who carried out the mission. However quite a lot of information shops have famous that the reviews might change.
Trump has claimed that Iran’s nuclear websites have been “obliterated” and, like Hegseth, has cited different assessments and statements. However the full impression of the U.S. bombing strikes continues to be being studied.
At first of his press convention, Hegseth complained that the DIA evaluation was “leaked as a result of somebody had an agenda to attempt to muddy the waters and make it appear like this historic strike wasn’t profitable.”
“You cheer in opposition to Trump so laborious, in your DNA and in your blood, cheer in opposition to Trump since you need him not to achieve success so badm it’s important to cheer in opposition to the effciacy of those strikes,” Hegseth stated.
