To the editor: Your article on the partisan politics of meat consuming fails to say any coverage cause behind Democrats being vegetarian, as a substitute linking the selection to effete and elite sensibilities.
Truly, because the journal Nature Biotechnology editorialized just lately, “the toll of meat-eating” on the surroundings is “profound” — particularly, the annual consumption of 82 billion animals causes “large greenhouse gasoline emissions, land degradation, water use, deforestation, biodiversity loss, soil erosion, and waterway and air air pollution.”
Merete Rietveld, Los Angeles
..
To the editor: Hey, Republicans, a fast heads up.
Certain you like your nominee, who was convicted on 34 felony counts in a witch hunt. And, after all, his adjudication of sexual assault was a sham. Impeachments, rebel, stolen categorised paperwork — all pretend information.
However be warned: Your man is 78 years outdated and unfit. When you punch the “R” on Nov. 5, you is probably not voting on your favourite felon; you would possibly as a substitute be voting for a vegetarian.
John Weinell, San Clemente
..
To the editor: It’s so easy.
A plant-based weight loss plan is considerably cheaper than one with meat.
It’s environmentally sustainable (no cow farts warming the environment).
It’s demonstrably extra healthful (no cholesterol-induced issues requiring statins).
It’s kinder (no slaughterhouses).
It promotes wholesome weight administration, a win for slowing the fattening of America.
What’s to not like? Yay for Usha Vance, vice presidential nominee JD Vance’s spouse. I’m proud to be known as “liberal, wimpy and female.”
Alison M. Grimes, Yorba Linda
