QUESTION: Relating to Decide Hannah Dugan’s indictment, some are saying her defence is just like that of Donald Trump, and that is all political since she says she has absolute immunity. You’re the unbiased authorized supply. One lawyer buddy mentioned, “Ask Armstrong, and you’ll hear the authorized reality.” So what’s up with this?
GP
ANSWER: This county state decide of Wisconsin was correctly indicted for allegedly obstructing the arrest of a Mexican immigrant by federal US authorities. She has claimed that the costs must be dismissed as a result of she’s immune from prosecution for official acts. Her definition of a “authorized act” is that she may kill her partner and declare immunity.
This isn’t even remotely associated to the allegations of Trump commenting on the election as president. That’s throughout the scope of his place. What he’s alleged to have finished was not an official act by any stretch of the creativeness. She is an activist decide who disagrees with federal regulation however has no judicial energy to bypass that regulation. She had no jurisdiction over the ICE subject, which is in a federal courtroom, not a neighborhood county courtroom. If I had been within the grand jury, I’d have indicted her with out query. There is no such thing as a justification in any way for her actions, and there’s no declare that that is an official act for which she has immunity.
