Disgraced former lawyer Michael Avenatti, who has been imprisoned since February 2022 and was sentenced to an extra 14 years for stealing hundreds of thousands from shoppers—bringing his complete sentence to 19 years with out the potential of parole—has tweeted from jail attacking one other conman, Michael Cohen.
From his cell, Avenatti unleashed a barrage of accusations on Saturday. He challenged the general public to query the equity of being judged solely on the accusations of others, with out a possibility to defend oneself.
Avenatti wrote, “The following time you might be accused of one thing by somebody – a co-worker, neighbor, pal, important different, stranger – ask your self if it could be okay if solely they have been allowed to talk/accuse/antagonize whereas you weren’t allowed to reply to defend your self. In case your reply isn’t any, you then too needs to be angered by Trump not being allowed to reply to Cohen’s & Daniels’ nonsense.”
The following time you might be accused of one thing by somebody – a co-worker, neighbor, pal, important different, stranger – ask your self if it could be okay if solely they have been allowed to talk/accuse/antagonize whereas you weren’t allowed to reply to defend your self. In case your reply isn’t any,…
— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) Might 11, 2024
However Avenatti didn’t cease there. Following Cohen’s testimony on Tuesday, he took to Twitter once more to reaffirm his long-held view of Cohen as untrustworthy.
“Not like many, I’ve been constant for six years: Michael Cohen is a liar and a complete fraud/narcissist who cares solely about himself.”
“And allow us to not overlook about Ladies for Cohen and the 700+ ridiculous posts he fabricated in an effort to color himself as a superb lawyer, intercourse image, and so forth. I suppose he claims that was Trump’s fault too? Lololololol”
Not like many, I’ve been constant for six years: Michael Cohen is a liar and a complete fraud/narcissist who cares solely about himself. And allow us to not overlook about @womenforcohen and the 700+ ridiculous posts he fabricated in an effort to color himself as a superb lawyer, intercourse…
— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) Might 15, 2024
Final week’s tweets additionally noticed Avenatti accusing Keith Davidson, one other key witness in Trump’s trial, of mendacity and implicated Stormy Daniels in an extortion scheme towards Trump in 2016.
“Keith Davidson is mendacity. After I confronted her w/ her personal textual content msgs, Daniels admitted to me in early 2019 that she & Davidson had extorted Trump in Oct. 2016 – it was a shakedown. This was one of many many causes I fired her as a shopper in Feb. 2019.”
Keith Davidson is mendacity. After I confronted her w/ her personal textual content msgs, Daniels admitted to me in early 2019 that she & Davidson had extorted Trump in Oct. 2016 – it was a shakedown. This was one of many many causes I fired her as a shopper in Feb. 2019
— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) Might 2, 2024
Amidst this tirade, Avenatti additionally focused his former shopper Stormy Daniels with allegations of fraud and falsification of enterprise information. He recounted an interplay with producer Sarah Gibson, who approached him for participation in a documentary about Daniels. In line with Avenatti, Gibson revealed a plan to secretly pay Daniels for the documentary whereas concealing the funds from Trump and his legal professionals.
Learn his assertion under:
Will DA Bragg or Others Cost Stormy Daniels with Fraud and Falsification of Enterprise Information?
Assertion of Michael Avenatti – Final June, I used to be contacted by producer Sarah Gibson, who requested that l help with a documentary about my former shopper Stormy Daniels (I had fired Daniels as a shopper in February 2019). On June 25, 2023, at 12:09 p.m. PT, I spoke with Ms. Gibson by telephone, on a recorded line, and requested her a lot of questions so I may decide whether or not I’d comply with take part.
I used to be notably desirous about understanding whether or not the challenge was going to be official and honest, or as an alternative, a puff piece designed to place Daniels in a positive mild whereas ignoring details and trashing me and Donald Trump. I needed nothing to do with the challenge if it was the latter.
My first query to Ms. Gibson once we spoke was whether or not Daniels was being paid for the documentary. I requested this query as a result of if she was being paid for the doc, it could be a transparent indication to me that the challenge lacked integrity, could be one-sided, and managed by Daniels.
Ms. Gibson advised me that Daniels was being paid for the documentary, however that as a result of she owed Trump lots of of hundreds of {dollars} from a judgment Trump was attempting to gather from Daniels, they – Daniels, Gibson and others – had give you a plan that will permit Daniels to be secretly paid, whereas on the identical time holding the funds) from Trump and his attorneys.
Amongst different issues, she advised me that that they had fictionally “optioned” the rights to Daniels’ ebook after which routed the cash Daniels demanded by means of a fabricated “belief” that had been set-up within the title of Daniels’ daughter – all to cover the cash from Trump and keep away from paying the judgment.
To say that I used to be shocked once I was advised this might be an understatement. A lady I had by no means met or spoken to earlier than was admitting to me, on a recorded line, that Daniels, she and others had engaged in a number of overt felony acts (state and federal), together with falsification of enterprise information, wire fraud, and fraudulent transfers, all in an effort to defraud Trump and keep away from paying him what he was legally due. Because of the fraud, I declined to take part within the documentary.
If what Ms. Gibson advised me on the recorded line is true – and there’s each cause to consider it’s – how can DA Bragg probably depend on the testimony of Daniels, who’s herself responsible of fraud and not too long ago falsifying enterprise information to cover-up against the law (i.e. fraudulent switch and wire fraud)? Additional, will DA Bragg or others be promptly submitting felony expenses towards Daniels or others concerned on this scheme?
