“Claiming to supply the Twister Money service as a ‘privateness service,’ the defendants the truth is knew that it was a haven for criminals to interact in large-scale cash laundering and sanctions evasion,” the indictment alleged.
At trial, prosecutors introduced proof that they claimed proved that Twister Money was designed for cash laundering from the outset. Their witnesses included a rip-off sufferer whose stolen funds had been mentioned to have handed by way of Twister Money—although this account was contested on-line by distinguished members of the crypto business—and a convicted fraudster who used the service to launder ill-gotten features. “Washy, washy,” the fraudster supposedly wrote to his girlfriend, in a message about Twister Money.
When the federal government closed its case final week, prosecutors dismissed the subject of privateness as a handy distraction. “The actual cash wasn’t in so-called ‘privateness’ for regular individuals,” Benjamin Gianforti, one of many prosecutors, is quoted as saying. “It was in hiding soiled cash for criminals.”
Storm and the opposite builders even took to carrying a Twister Money-branded T-shirt emblazoned with a picture of a washer, prosecutors famous.
Storm’s attorneys, in the meantime, sought to argue that though their consumer had developed the know-how exploited by unhealthy actors, he had not engaged in any criminality himself nor dealt with any soiled cash. “You’ll by no means hear any proof that Roman or the [other] cofounders participated in any hacks,” mentioned Keri Curtis Axel, associate at regulation agency Waymaker and counsel to Storm, in her opening remarks.
Storm was powerless to stop the abuses of Twister Money, the protection reportedly argued, as a result of he and the opposite builders had relinquished the flexibility to change or disable the underlying code, within the spirit of decentralization.
The protection referred to as to the stand various witnesses who spoke to the potential official makes use of for Twister Money. However Storm didn’t testify, which might have opened him as much as cross-examination by the prosecution.
Finally, regardless of discovering Storm responsible of the lesser cash transmitting violation, the jury proved receptive to the protection’s line of reasoning.
“The jury break up the proverbial child,” says Mark Bini, a associate at regulation agency Reed Smith’s crypto follow and a former federal prosecutor. “Whereas they possible credited the protection’s compelling arguments that there are official privateness makes use of for mixers and that Storm was circuitously concerned in any of the crimes by which Twister Money was used, they felt uncomfortable with the steps that Twister Money took or didn’t take to stop illicit makes use of.”
Storm now awaits sentencing, which often takes place a few months after a conviction. In the meantime, the DOJ should resolve whether or not to retry the cash laundering rely on which the jury couldn’t agree.
“The federal government may select to retry Storm on the hung rely, however primarily based on the notes that had been getting back from the jury, I anticipate that they may go to sentencing primarily based upon the conviction they secured,” says Bini. “Whereas they’re prone to argue for a stiff sentence, the jury’s verdict seems to take a variety of the sting out of the federal government’s case.”
Replace 8/06/25 at 3:32pm EST: This text has been up to date with a press release from Matthew Inexperienced, an professional witness for the protection.
