To the editor: College of California President Michael V. Drake’s coverage on campus protests within the aftermath of current actions over the Israel-
Gaza struggle goes too far. I at all times oppose a no-tolerance coverage, as a result of there are at all times particulars that might not be foreseen. (“Zero tolerance at UC campuses in new order banning encampments, masking, blocking paths,” Aug. 19)
The constraints towards blocking pathways is one factor (though particulars could make a distinction). However Drake exhibits a scarcity of consideration by barring any masking that may defend identities. That has nothing to do with security or defending others’ rights.
Masking for medical and different causes ought to take precedence over figuring out somebody for prosecution. I’m sorry if it’s a hindrance, however folks’s lives actually depend on it.
Face masks would possibly not be required, however many nonetheless put on them, and for excellent cause. I do. COVID-19 is spreading wildly. If I get it, it may result in my dying, actually, as a result of I might not have the ability to bear the medical therapy I should have to be able to keep alive.
This ban on masking that may defend identities is outrageous. There ought to be no tolerance for this no-tolerance coverage.
Kevin FitzMaurice, Los Angeles
..
To the editor: The protesters who disrupt life at our universities shouldn’t be allowed to take action. Lastly, the powers that be at UC and the California State College system have made the straightforward and proper resolution to not enable encampments on faculty campuses.
Peaceable protesting is ok; let’s depart it there.
I additionally marvel, does the common faculty pupil actually know what’s going on within the Center East and even care? Or are they extra involved about their subsequent midterm and the place the get together is on Friday evening?
Matthew D. Kerster, Gardena
..
To the editor: Drake’s current pronouncements basically try and field in anti-genocide protest to one thing akin to a couple college students sitting silently close to some college constructing holding an indication saying, “To Israel: Please cease killing folks with American weapons.”
Drake’s try and lend an air of legitimacy to his directives by “noting” that UC Berkeley was “the birthplace of the Free Speech Motion” is little greater than PR icing on his authoritarian insurance policies.
Two factors: What most media insist are “pro-Palestinian” protesters are extra truthfully labeled anti-genocide. They embrace Christian, Muslim, Jewish and nonreligious protesters.
The article states that, “Complaints rose as [some] mentioned the tents had been impeding college operations.” As a participant, I guarantee you that protests blocking pathways, even roadways, are sometimes mandatory and shouldn’t be “unlawful” in an sincere democracy.
Jim Mamer, San Diego
