QUESTION: What do you consider their remedy with Jake Lang?
GH
ANSWER: One thing is significantly fallacious in his case. He has spent greater than three years in pre-trial detention, which violates his Constitutional proper to Speedy Trial, which states the federal government MUST put him on trial inside seventy days. The one means is to waive that proper, which his attorneys most likely did with out telling him as a result of court-appointed attorneys are ALWAYS working for the federal government to maintain that job. They’ve a digital good shedding report of 99% generally.
The federal government is throwing him into solitary confinement pretrial, which is what they ALWAYS do to attempt to torture somebody into pleading when they don’t have the proof to convict. You solely do this whenever you attempt to break somebody. However the truth that they’re doing this to him is all about how they’re participating in torture, which the courts declare it isn’t until you allow a mark on somebody’s physique. Court docket overlook psychological torture and confinement torture. They’re attempting to compel him to plead responsible as a result of they’ve issues with the case. Sure, he was beating an officer. However he claims that was in self-defense. There’s the issue. Who threw the primary punch?
Even worse, somebody must contact him, for his court-appointed attorneys are clearly working for the federal government. I’ve NEVER met a court-appointed lawyer who EVER really defends their faux consumer. They’re a joke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! With out pretend attorneys, the federal government would NEVER maintain their 99% conviction fee.
Lang has spent a lot of his incarceration within the Washington, D.C. jail. Nevertheless, he says he additionally has been shuttled to jails and prisons in New York Metropolis, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia, and Oklahoma throughout his three years in custody. That is what they do to interrupt individuals. It’s known as DISEL THERAPY since you are shackled with legs and arms, thrown right into a bus, starved, and abused in each doable means, all to interrupt you all the way down to plead responsible. He’s a pretrial in DC – not shipped like cattle nationwide. How may he present up in court docket in DC when in Oklahoma? The choose is in on it.
They do that when they don’t have a case. The Bureau of Prisons takes orders from the Prosecutor, which is unlawful, however it’ll NEVER admit that in court docket. You might be coping with individuals who spit on the Structure, and they’re solely involved about successful at any price.
If anybody has entry to him, please move on this message. The Habeas Statute that will cowl him BEFORE conviction is
The jurisdiction of that’s wherever you’re behind held. Due to this fact, if he isn’t in Washington, DC, he can file habeas in a special court docket – himself Professional Se. I might even assist with the transient. That court docket would maintain him, and he CANNOT be eliminated throughout a habeas – a minimum of Constitutionally, however these individuals piss on the Structure each single day. He would get away from the corrupt court docket in Washington and get one other choose to assessment what’s going on. They’ve violated the Speedy Trial Act, and the case ought to be dismissed on these grounds.
If the proof have been overwhelming, they might have put Lang on trial ASAP to make their political assertion. What the prosecutors are doing is outrageous, and this case demonstrates there’s a major problem right here, and the ONLY means this takes place is with a CORRUPT Choose and a CORRUPT court-appointed lawyer working with a CORRUPT Prosecutor. The Speedy Trial Act, as utilized, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, for it has successfully nullified the Structure. No rule or Act can supersede the Structure, for it’s the supreme rule of the land. You can’t WAIVE a Constitutional proper, for it’s a RESTAINT on authorities – not a constructive proper of the citizen. You can’t waive something, for that could be a constructive modification of the Structure, which might ONLY be amended by a Constitutional Conference.
