The Israeli military did deploy its so-called Hannibal Directive, which permits the army to make use of all vital drive to stop the seize of troopers, throughout the October 7 Hamas-led assaults on Israel, ensuing within the lack of each civilian and army lives, an investigation by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz has discovered.
Here’s what we all know to this point:
What’s the Hannibal Directive and the way did it come about?
For practically twenty years, army censorship stored the directive, also referred to as the Hannibal Process or Hannibal Protocol, below wraps. It permits the Israeli army to make use of any drive vital to stop Israeli troopers from being captured and brought into enemy territory – as much as and together with motion that may result in these captives’ deaths.
In 1986, Israeli military commanders drew up the doctrine after three troopers from the infantry Givati Brigade had been captured by the Lebanese group Hezbollah.
At the moment, Israel occupied a southern area of Lebanon, invading the nation in 1982. Hezbollah captured troopers patrolling this zone, which might stay below Israeli occupation till 2000.
Throughout that incident, members of the brigade noticed a car getting away with their fellow troopers however didn’t open fireplace. The directive got here in response to make sure this could by no means occur once more.
The stays of the captured troopers had been returned to Israel in 1996 in alternate for the our bodies of 123 Hezbollah fighters, based on the Israeli authorities.
Israel’s hardline stance since then is because of the truth that a soldier’s abduction is a strategic transfer for an enemy, Yehuda Shaul, the founding father of Israeli NGO Breaking the Silence who served the Israeli military from 2001 to 2004, instructed Al Jazeera in November final 12 months. Captives give them negotiating energy and the flexibility to have an effect on nationwide morale and public assist for a battle, he mentioned. As well as, an enemy can not extract strategic info if the troopers get killed earlier than being taken captive.
All through the present battle, the destiny of the captives taken by Hamas fighters into Gaza on October 7 continues to drive Israeli public opinion towards Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration. For the general public, the return of the captives has change into a defining facet of the warfare. Their welfare has been named as a precedence in a wide range of polls carried out by Israeli establishments.
The identical has been true for earlier captives. In 2006, Hamas seized Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. After 5 years in captivity, he was launched in alternate for greater than 1,000 Palestinian prisoners, the best Israel has launched in alternate for any soldier.
The origins of the directive’s title are disputed with some sources saying it’s named after a Carthaginian basic who selected to poison himself as an alternative of falling captive to the Romans in 181 BC.
Israeli army officers, nonetheless, have mentioned a pc randomly generated the title.
In 2016, Israeli media, together with The Instances of Israel, reported that Israeli army chief Lieutenant-Basic Gadi Eisenkot had determined to “cancel” the Hannibal Protocol over obvious confusion over the freedoms it granted.
The Instances of Israel reported on the time: “The directive permits troopers to make use of doubtlessly large quantities of drive to stop a soldier from falling into the palms of the enemy. This contains the potential for endangering the lifetime of the soldier in query with the intention to stop his seize.
“Some officers, nonetheless, perceive the order to imply that troopers must intentionally kill their comrade with the intention to cease him from being taken prisoner, not that they could unintentionally injure or kill him of their try.”
What has the Haaretz investigation revealed?
Regardless of stories the directive had been cancelled again in 2016, the Haaretz investigation, revealed on Sunday, discovered that Israeli commanders ordered its deployment with none caveat or additional clarification throughout a chaotic response to the occasions of October 7 when Hamas fighters attacked military outposts and surrounding villages in southern Israel.
The assaults killed 1,139 individuals and 251 others had been taken to Gaza as captives.
Investigating the Israeli response to that shock assault, journalists from Haaretz reviewed army paperwork and gained testimonies from troopers, mid-level and senior officers to disclose the orders and procedures laid down by the Gaza Division, Southern Command and the Israeli basic employees on that day, demonstrating not simply widespread data of the Hannibal Protocol however its use at numerous areas of the assault.
In the course of the chaos, whereas Israeli military commanders struggled to completely grasp the dimensions of the assault by Hamas, it’s alleged the directive was deployed at three army services. Nonetheless, the orders failed to tell apart between troopers being captured and civilians.
In line with Haaretz, at 7:18am, throughout the early hours of the assault, a report of a kidnapping at Beit Hanoon, identified to Israelis as Erez, a crossing between Israel and Gaza, the order given by the divisional headquarters was merely “Hannibal at Erez”, with no additional clarification or clarification, suggesting its that means was already well-known to everybody included within the message.
A message despatched to the Gaza Division about 5 hours after the assaults started, ordered: “Not a single car can return to Gaza.”
A supply inside Israel’s Southern Command, chargeable for policing elements of the borders with Egypt, Jordan and Gaza, subsequently instructed Haaretz: “Everybody knew by then that such autos could possibly be carrying kidnapped civilians or troopers … Everybody knew what it meant to not let any autos return to Gaza.”
A United Nations-backed report from final month put the overall variety of civilians and troopers misplaced to Israeli fireplace that day at greater than a dozen. Nonetheless, Haaretz mentioned it’s inconceivable to find out the extent of Israeli losses on account of the directive.
Has the Hannibal Directive been used on different events?
There have been a number of events as much as its supposed revocation in 2016 when the Hannibal Directive was used or was suspected to have been deployed.
- In October 2000, three Israeli troopers had been captured by Hezbollah within the occupied Shebaa Farms (Har Dov) on the border between the occupied Golan Heights, Lebanon and Syria. On discovering the troopers’ seize, Israel’s Northern Command ordered a “Hannibal state of affairs”, resulting in Israeli assault helicopters firing upon the convoy of autos regarded as carrying the captured troopers.
- In 2006, following the kidnapping of an Israeli soldier by Hamas, the Hannibal Directive was invoked, however it was too late to be carried out. One month later, it was once more deployed following the seize of two Israeli troopers by Hezbollah. “If we had discovered them, we might have hit them, even when it meant killing the troopers,” a senior Israeli official was later quoted by The Washington Submit as saying.
- The directive was additionally mentioned to have been activated throughout Israel’s 2008 warfare on Gaza when a Palestinian’s home was shelled to stop the seize of a wounded Israeli soldier inside.
- In 2014, the directive was deployed in Rafah following the kidnapping of a junior Israeli officer. Investigating the carnage that adopted the soldier’s seize, Amnesty Worldwide concluded that the Hannibal Directive had been deployed, resulting in the deaths of as much as 200 Palestinian civilians, together with 75 kids, in an assault that amounted to what it described as “a warfare crime”. The Israeli military later denied that the directive had been enacted, though conceded it had been referenced a number of occasions throughout radio communications.
- The Hannibal Directive was additionally thought to have been used throughout the 2014 Battle of Shujayea in Gaza Metropolis, in addition to on the Qalandiya refugee camp in 2016, when an Israeli soldier went lacking within the camp, resulting in the large deployment of troops.
- Quoting a senior army supply, Haaretz reported that the Hannibal Directive was deployed on October 7 final 12 months and that it was not ordered by the divisional commander. The newspaper requested who gave the order, to which the supply mentioned it “will maybe be established by post-war investigations”.
What has the Israeli authorities mentioned concerning the Hannibal Directive?
In 2006, The Jerusalem Submit described the directive because the “rumoured” commonplace process for use within the occasion of a kidnap try. “Troopers are instructed, although by no means formally” the content material of this order, the newspaper reported.
The Israeli army has usually denied the interpretation of the directive that permits for the killing of fellow troopers. Nonetheless, confusion over the wording of the directive in addition to the restriction of written variations of the protocol to senior officers has led to ambiguity over the worth to be positioned on particular person lives within the occasion of an abduction.
In 2011, this led then-military chief Benny Gantz to overtly state that the directive didn’t allow the killing of Israeli troopers to stop abduction.
What has the Israeli army mentioned?
Discussions concerning the Hannibal Directive had been extensively reported to be banned by the Israeli army censor till 2003 and the army has not commented formally about use of the directive.
Approached by Haaretz, an Israeli army spokesperson mentioned the military “has begun conducting inner investigations of what transpired on October 7 and the previous interval”, including, “The purpose of those investigations is to be taught and to attract classes which could possibly be utilized in persevering with the battle. When these investigations are concluded, the outcomes will likely be introduced to the general public with transparency.”
