WHAT’S THE HISTORY?
The Smithsonian’s zoo, arguably the birthplace of panda diplomacy within the West, had been house to massive pandas since 1972. It was from Nov 8, 2023, that the zoo misplaced its big pandas for the primary time in additional than 50 years, when Mei Xiang, Tian Tian and their offspring, Xiao Qi Ji have been flown again to China.
At that time, there have been solutions that panda diplomacy was over as tensions between the US and China had risen considerably. Relations between US and Chinese language companies additionally appeared to be getting worse. A survey by the US-China Enterprise Council of its members in 2023 discovered that 34 per cent had stopped or diminished deliberate funding in China over the earlier 12 months.
However later in November, China’s President Xi Jinping held a four-hour summit with President Joe Biden on the Asia-Pacific Financial Cooperation (APEC) convention in San Francisco and signalled that there was potential for rapprochement. Xi stated that, in a world of challenges, the US and China “should deal with our relationships nicely”. Xi alluded to the pandas’ reputation with Individuals.
He added that China is “able to proceed our cooperation with the US on panda conservation”, and added that China will “do our greatest to satisfy the needs of the Californians in order to deepen the pleasant ties between our two peoples”.
Xi additionally arrange a dinner with lots of of tech executives together with Apple CEO Tim Prepare dinner and enterprise leaders on the sidelines of the APEC assembly. So it might appear logical that Beijing has determined to ship its nationwide treasures to California to sign the state’s significance to the Asian superpower.
It seems like Beijing’s willingness to ship its bears again to the US is a part of a method to enhance not solely its political relationship with Biden, however, maybe extra importantly, to assist deliver again US funding, and reframe Beijing as a friendlier buying and selling energy.
Chee Meng Tan is Assistant Professor of Enterprise Economics, College of Nottingham. This commentary first appeared in The Dialog.
