To the editor: The letter you printed concerning the massive variety of destructive articles about former President Trump and only a few destructive articles about Vice President Kamala Harris is lifeless on. Try to be printing comparable articles about her.
I counsel that you just present protection for her federal trial over her conduct on Jan. 6, 2021, and her efforts to steal the presidency; her New York civil trial for defamation and sexual abuse; her different New York trial for fraud; her federal Florida trial for allegedly stealing paperwork and refusing to return them; and her Georgia election interference trial.
You must also have protection for each time that she has talked about utilizing the U.S. navy in opposition to the American folks, each need she has ever uttered about eager to be a dictator, and each tariff she has ever championed that may act like a tax on the American folks.
Emery Galambos, Los Angeles
..
To the editor: To these readers who accuse the L.A. Occasions of unfairness in its protection of the 2 presidential candidates, I provide the next state of affairs for consideration.
If the Democratic candidate routinely spouted false and harmful prattle whereas the Republican candidate persistently provided fact-based and wise options for a greater America, what could be the doubtless method for the L.A. Occasions to take?
I’ve little question that this newspaper’s journalistic integrity and dedication to truthful reporting would dictate in depth and aggressive protection.
The L.A. Occasions is a Democratic Get together apparatchik? Hardly.
Frederick Miller, Los Angeles
